Poor stand establishment resulting in lower yield is a major constraint to expanding winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) land area across the semiarid temperate regions of the northern Great Plains. We conducted a direct-seeded study at nine sites across western Canada totaling 26 environments (site-years) over three growing seasons (2011)(2012)(2013) to observe the responses of the winter wheat cultivar CDC Buteo to fi ve levels of seed treatment (i) Check-no, and (v) dual fungicide/ insecticidal seed treatment: tebuconozole, + metalxyl + imidacloprid; and two levels of fall-applied fungicide (i) Check-no application or (ii) foliar-applied prothioconazole {2-[2-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxypropyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione} performed in mid-October. Th e check and the fungicide seed treatment, metalaxyl, produced similarly low grain yield resulting in lower net returns, whereas the dual fungicide/insecticide seed treatment provided the highest yield and net returns (CAN+$13 ha -1 ). Fall-applied fungicide improved yield (0.06 Mg ha -1 ), but decreased net returns (-$12 ha -1 ). Plant density increased slightly (13 plants m -2 ) when seed treatments included the insecticide component, imidacloprid. Fall foliar fungicides generally improved spring plant density; however, no benefi t was observed in seed treatments containing imidacloprid. Greater yield and plant stand stability was observed with fall-applied foliar fungicide applications; however, fall foliar would be cost prohibitive. Th e benefi ts of a fall foliar fungicide application requires further exploration in the context of an added input or as an alternative to a spring application as the net returns of a fall foliar compared to no application in the system render the input cost-prohibitive.