2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12142-009-0126-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Sanctions and Political Repression: Assessing the Impact of Coercive Diplomacy on Political Freedoms

Abstract: This article offers a thorough analysis of the unintended impact economic sanctions have on political repression-referred to in this study as the level of the government respect for democratic freedoms and human rights. We argue that economic coercion is a counterproductive policy tool that reduces the level of political freedoms in sanctioned countries. Instead of coercing the sanctioned regime into reforming itself, sanctions inadvertently enhance the regime's coercive capacity and create incentives for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our political variable covers both the Sanction-Democracy relation evident already in the work of Galtung (1967) Figure 3. Time path of utility as the economy moves from free trade to autarky due to a sanction Sanction-Repression link recently explored by Peksen & Drury (2009.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our political variable covers both the Sanction-Democracy relation evident already in the work of Galtung (1967) Figure 3. Time path of utility as the economy moves from free trade to autarky due to a sanction Sanction-Repression link recently explored by Peksen & Drury (2009.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I was not able to confirm the two hypotheses that investigate the impact of economic sanctions on the level of rights protection in the 12 countries that were targeted by sanctions. These results are not surprising, as a finding in the other direction would be at stakes with solid research by Reed Wood (2008), Peksen (2009), and by Peksen and Drury (2009) that has already established the negative impact that economic sanctions have on human rights. The present project sought to investigate whether these findings were true for a subset of sanctions episodes-those imposed because of the poor record of rights protection in the target country.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Work by Peksen (2009) and by Peksen and Drury (2009) confirm the adverse-though unintended-consequences of economic sanctions for human rights. This research relies on a different measure of human rights protection, the Cingranelli and Richards dataset, but focus on the same group of rights: those associated with physical integrity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…26 Lastly, the U.S. sanctions policy has been employed without a significant secondary forcing mechanism that is practically required to facilitate To submit would signal that the regime can be swayed by external political influences; that the opposition has legitimacy; and that active political dissent will be tolerated. 28 These perceptions would weaken President Assad to the extent that he would lose the internal support that has kept him in power. sanctions policy against Syria.…”
Section: Discussion / Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%