2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3215484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Values of Coastal Erosion Management: Joint Estimation of Use and Passive Use Values With Recreation Demand and Contingent Valuation Data

Abstract: Revealed and stated preference survey data from North Carolina households are utilized to estimate a joint structural microeconometric model of recreation demand and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for coastal erosion management among beach visitors and nonvisitors. We test for and reject weak complementarity, implying existence of non-use values associated with management of North Carolina's coastal resources. We find stronger preferences for shoreline retreat (median WTP = $22.20 per household, per year) as a manag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results show that the income variable is statistically signi cant only in single bounded and doublebounded dichotomous choice models of domestic visitors (at the 5% level). The positive income sign is the same as previous studies (e.g., Bateman et al, 2005;Landry et al, 2018;Yoo and Yang, 2001). The result indicates that visitors with higher incomes (in Models 1 and 2), are likely to pay more for conservation efforts in the CLC MPA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Their results show that the income variable is statistically signi cant only in single bounded and doublebounded dichotomous choice models of domestic visitors (at the 5% level). The positive income sign is the same as previous studies (e.g., Bateman et al, 2005;Landry et al, 2018;Yoo and Yang, 2001). The result indicates that visitors with higher incomes (in Models 1 and 2), are likely to pay more for conservation efforts in the CLC MPA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%