2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic viability analysis of a construction and demolition waste recycling plant in Portugal – part I: location, materials, technology and economic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
2
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
83
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies [26] and [25] advocate the enforcement of the "polluter pays" principle and find market based instruments such as increases in landfill taxes, subsidies on recycled aggregates and taxes on the use of natural aggregates to be the best option for policy makers in incentivizing the recycling industry. As for the operation of the recycling facility itself, in the case of Portugal it was found that they can be profitable with a return on investment period under 8 years in all cases of a sensitivity analysis [27], [28].…”
Section: Technical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies [26] and [25] advocate the enforcement of the "polluter pays" principle and find market based instruments such as increases in landfill taxes, subsidies on recycled aggregates and taxes on the use of natural aggregates to be the best option for policy makers in incentivizing the recycling industry. As for the operation of the recycling facility itself, in the case of Portugal it was found that they can be profitable with a return on investment period under 8 years in all cases of a sensitivity analysis [27], [28].…”
Section: Technical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costs (LCC) analyses of the use of RA and NA in concrete production Preliminary LCAs showed the environmental impacts are extremely sensitive to road haulage distances [32,33]. Although it is logical to assume that this may be a determining factor in a LCC, one must also consider the high costs associated to selective demolition and determine how these could affect the global cost of a cubic meter of concrete under several circumstances (i.e.…”
Section: Recommendations For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for a 350 tonne/h facility, average gate fees of 48/tonne for mixed and 8/tonne for separated input materials, the need to spend around 1.13 million euros a year on rejected material transportation and another 10.3 million euros a year to dump it in landfills (or onward transport for further treatment), a 2-year return on investment period is possible [12,13].…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%