2006
DOI: 10.1080/01446190500529432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economics of on‐site vs. off‐site fabrication of rebar

Abstract: Many contractors prefer on-site fabrication of rebar while others find that off-site fabrication is more advantageous. The economics of on-site and off-site fabrication of rebar need to be compared on the basis of several factors that include the project environment, wages, labour considerations, the initial investment for equipment, waste of rebar, the cost of inventory, cycle time, and supply chain management. This study presents an economic comparison of the on-site and off-site fabrication practices of reb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These production challenges are related to high levels of product mix [6], traditional supply chain configurations [7], engineering faults and rework [8], management decisions [9], and cyclic market demand [10]. Adverse effects of these production challenges are eventually translated to the manufacturing floor and together with process dependencies generate bottlenecks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These production challenges are related to high levels of product mix [6], traditional supply chain configurations [7], engineering faults and rework [8], management decisions [9], and cyclic market demand [10]. Adverse effects of these production challenges are eventually translated to the manufacturing floor and together with process dependencies generate bottlenecks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to quote Crowley (1998), 'solutions from the manufacturing industry cannot be simply applied to problems of the construction industry, without those solutions being re-engineered themselves'. Further, Polat et al (2006) demonstrated that simply moving efforts offsite does not necessarily guarantee efficient construction.…”
Section: Discussion On the Challenge To Using Osm In House Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades however, the interest for lowering costs by focusing on logistics has increased (cf. Polat, et al, 2006;Said and El-Rayes, 2011). Grawe (2009) highlight that cost efficiency is a "necessity" in logistics and that many practitioners rate cost control and cost reduction as their main priority.…”
Section: Logistics Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%