2010
DOI: 10.1021/es1008592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem-Based Assessment Indices of Restoration for Daya Bay near a Nuclear Power Plant in South China

Abstract: China has adopted nuclear power generation as one of the strategic energy sources to resolve the dilemma between its evergrowing energy demand and the associated environmental issues. To achieve the latter, a systematic assessment of the state of the ecosystem near nuclear power plants and its restoration via ongoing recovery actions would be highly desirable and much needed. Current assessment methods are mostly based on the individual components of the ecosystem and the methods are therefore not integrated. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower ECI means more mismatching and lower harmony among ecosystem structure/services. Referred to the previous health assessment at estuary [19], [20], each indicator in the range of [0, 0.4], (0.4, 0.6], (0.6, 0.9] and (0.9, 1] means ill, unhealthy, sub-healthy and healthy state of ecosystem, respectively. After measuring the ecosystem health in terms of ecosystem coordination, we quantify the contribution of each structure/services to incoordination, and identify the incoordination factors influencing ecosystem health. where EI is the indexes in the EVI section, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower ECI means more mismatching and lower harmony among ecosystem structure/services. Referred to the previous health assessment at estuary [19], [20], each indicator in the range of [0, 0.4], (0.4, 0.6], (0.6, 0.9] and (0.9, 1] means ill, unhealthy, sub-healthy and healthy state of ecosystem, respectively. After measuring the ecosystem health in terms of ecosystem coordination, we quantify the contribution of each structure/services to incoordination, and identify the incoordination factors influencing ecosystem health. where EI is the indexes in the EVI section, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation of DNPP was in 1994, and the historical monitoring results of relevant environmental factors are shown in Table 4. The results show that decades of operation of DNPP and exploitation of various human activities (It's not just CNPPs but it's a collection of all human activities and it's inseparable) have pushed Daya Bay's ecosystem away from its baseline and its structure and functions are impaired; ecosystem restoration does not make up for the weakening of the ecological carrying capacity due to sea use [23], nonetheless, the restoration of important wetland habitats is conducive to the improvement of the functions of key marine ecosystems and the maintenance of marine biodiversity. The obvious and stable change is characterized by increasing the species diversity of benthos.…”
Section: Exemplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts of thermal discharge on the nearshore ecosystem are mainly reflected by a reduction in dissolved oxygen (DO), increased concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in water, changes to the physiological activity and function of marine organisms, and reduced biodiversity (Chen et al, 2010). Thermal discharge has the most obvious impact on primary producers such as phytoplankton.…”
Section: Effects Of Thermal Discharge From Nuclear Power Plants On the Structure And Biomass Of Plankton Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%