2014
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem carbon stocks in Pinus palustris forests

Abstract: Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) restoration in the southeastern United States offers opportunities for carbon (C) sequestration. Ecosystem C stocks are not well understood in longleaf pine forests, which are typically of low density and maintained by prescribed fire. The objectives of this research were to develop allometric equations for above-and below-ground biomass and quantify ecosystem C stocks in five longleaf pine forests ranging in age from 5 to 87 years and in basal area from 0.4 to 22.6 m 2 ·h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with system I (based on DBH only), system III additionally included tree age which was significant only in the bole biomass equation, but also improved the branch and total biomass predictions. This response may be related to changes in wood density as trees age [9,22] and the interdependence of additive models. When A was included in the models that used DBH and HT (model system IV), it was significant in bole, branch and foliage equations, improving bole, branch and total biomass predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with system I (based on DBH only), system III additionally included tree age which was significant only in the bole biomass equation, but also improved the branch and total biomass predictions. This response may be related to changes in wood density as trees age [9,22] and the interdependence of additive models. When A was included in the models that used DBH and HT (model system IV), it was significant in bole, branch and foliage equations, improving bole, branch and total biomass predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the positive coefficient of DBH and the negative coefficient of HT in branch and foliage components imply that branch and foliage biomass increase with the increase of DBH, but for the same DBH, live branch and foliage biomass decrease with increased tree height. (9) In the DBH and A based system (Equation (9)), DBH is significant in all component equations, but age is significant only for the bole biomass component (Table 5). This implies that with tree DBH information in the equation, the addition of tree age did not improve branch and foliage biomass estimation but did improve bole biomass estimation.…”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…)-dominated forests within the Southeastern United States (SEUS), to better understand their carbon dynamics [18][19][20]. The longleaf pine forest is an excellent example of how placement of a stand within the landscape has led to variation in structure and function, particularly when influenced by water limitations [21][22][23][24]. Soil water holding capacity has been shown to be the primary variable that controls net primary production (NPP) within the longleaf ecosystem [21], and was linked to plant rooting zones and access to the water table [23,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%