2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2006.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem structure, function, and restoration success: Are they related?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Few authors have used them to describe the dynamics of Iberian cork oak ecosystems Cortina et al 2006;Huntsinger and Bartolome 1992) but seldom have they identified the underlying ecological and social mechanisms that explain the barriers for vegetation change (Acácio et al , 2010. Figure 1 transitions between them.…”
Section: A State and Transition Model To Describe Landscape Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few authors have used them to describe the dynamics of Iberian cork oak ecosystems Cortina et al 2006;Huntsinger and Bartolome 1992) but seldom have they identified the underlying ecological and social mechanisms that explain the barriers for vegetation change (Acácio et al , 2010. Figure 1 transitions between them.…”
Section: A State and Transition Model To Describe Landscape Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compositional metrics can be difficult to interpret given their multidimensional nature (Legendre and Legendre 1998;McCune and Grace 2002) and are rarely considered in the context of ecological restoration, in part because long-term data are necessary to detect compositional trends (Lindborg and Eriksson 2004). However, we suggest that composition should be explicitly considered because having restored ecosystem structure and functioning does not necessarily mean that composition has also been restored (Lockwood and Pimm 1999), and often there is not a direct relationship between species diversity, composition, and ecosystem functioning (Schwartz et al 2000;Cortina et al 2006). For example, an area with the desired plant cover and standing crop could be dominated by nonnative species, and therefore, be a failure with respect to plant community composition (e.g., Christian and Wilson 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further research is needed to link system structure to process (Cortina et al, 2006) and then process to ecological and social benefits to understand regional complexity. This is fundamental to evaluating the efficiency of restoration by including all costs and benefits (Loomis, 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspctivesmentioning
confidence: 99%