1972
DOI: 10.1093/jee/65.6.1615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edaphic and Agronomic Charactes that Affect Potential for Rootworm Damage to Corn in Iowa12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as observed with the sticky trap data, WCR feeding in first-year corn was below the economic threshold of 3.0 using the Iowa 1-6 scale (Hills and Peters 1971;Turpin et al 1972). While firstyear corn root damage was below threshold, damage in continuous corn averaged 2.9 on the Iowa scale, and this bordered on the economic threshold of 3.0.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as observed with the sticky trap data, WCR feeding in first-year corn was below the economic threshold of 3.0 using the Iowa 1-6 scale (Hills and Peters 1971;Turpin et al 1972). While firstyear corn root damage was below threshold, damage in continuous corn averaged 2.9 on the Iowa scale, and this bordered on the economic threshold of 3.0.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Sticky traps were not placed in corn plots in this study. Ten corn roots were taken from around each cage and rated using the Iowa scale (1-6) after the root systems were washed with water (Turpin et al 1972). Traps were inspected weekly and replaced biweekly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if reduced insecticide performance can be expected because of high organic matter content in soils occurring in low-lying areas, then the reduced adult corn rootworm emergence in low-lying areas of both the treated and the untreated fields of this study may have been the result of factors other than insecticide action, such as aggregated oviposition based on soil or other environmental factors. Turpin et al (1972) considered soil drainage among the significant edaphic factors that mediated rootworm infestation potential in their prediction equation for rootworm damage. They also concluded that predictive methods could be used to identify fields likely to require treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a significant difference in rootworm survival between soil types suggests that potential differences in soil physical properties between soil types did not significantly influence rootworm population dynamics in this study. Soil factors that could vary by soil type that have been shown to affect WCR egg survival, larval establishment, or larval survival and movement in the soil (i.e., texture, porosity, moisture, compaction, etc., Turpin et al 1972;MacDonald and Ellis 1990;Beckler et al 2004;Meinke et al 2009), did not appear to significantly impact the results of this study in an irrigated system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%