1974
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.226.5.1198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge damage effect on measurements of urea and sodium flux in frog skin

Abstract: The APS Journal Legacy Content is the corpus of 100 years of historical scientific research from the American Physiological Society research journals. This package goes back to the first issue of each of the APS journals including the American Journal of Physiology, first published in 1898. The full text scanned images of the printed pages are easily searchable. Downloads quickly in PDF format.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig with lower theophylline concentrations and also with vasopressin (ADH); the latter, at a dose of 20 mU/ml produces a stimulation (maximal) of 28 4-5% in both Na and urea fluxes, similar to that observed by Helman and Miller (15). The linearity between Na and urea outfluxes is also maintained with vasopressin.…”
Section: Quantitative Relationships Among Na If CL and Urea Fluxessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As shown in Fig with lower theophylline concentrations and also with vasopressin (ADH); the latter, at a dose of 20 mU/ml produces a stimulation (maximal) of 28 4-5% in both Na and urea fluxes, similar to that observed by Helman and Miller (15). The linearity between Na and urea outfluxes is also maintained with vasopressin.…”
Section: Quantitative Relationships Among Na If CL and Urea Fluxessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the permeability of the tissue under investigation is affected by the compression exerted at its edge by clamping and this effect has been referred to as edge damage. For example, in frog skin the edge damage caused the measured values of permeability to urea and sodium to increase by 7- and 20.8 fold above their nonedge-damaged values [22]. For this reason, we have used an alternative simple apparatus, minimizing the edge effect (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shunt causes significant reduction of the measured electrical potential and resistance (Dobson & Kidder, 1968;Helman & Miller, 1973). Helman and Miller (1974) found that the values of the permeability of urea, the passive permeability of sodium, and the electromotive force of the sodium battery (ENa) are strongly dependent on the extent of the edge damage. On the basis of their observation, we evaluated, in the present study, the extent of the edge damage by measuring these parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%