2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a detailed review of the large body of literature on effects of retention is beyond the scope of this paper. The following studies provide examples of the benefits of retention on birds and understorey (Merrill et al, 1998;Beese and Bryant, 1999), canopy lichens (Coxson and Stevenson, 2005), aerial insects (Deans et al, 2004), ground-layer bryophytes (Dovčiak et al, 2006), small terrestrial mammals (Gitzen et al, 2007) and saproxylic beetles (Jonsell and Weslien, 2003). Since the retention of structural attributes has not been practised for very long, short-term responses (assumption 1) are documented better than the long-term responses (assumption 2).…”
Section: Retention Of Old-growth Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a detailed review of the large body of literature on effects of retention is beyond the scope of this paper. The following studies provide examples of the benefits of retention on birds and understorey (Merrill et al, 1998;Beese and Bryant, 1999), canopy lichens (Coxson and Stevenson, 2005), aerial insects (Deans et al, 2004), ground-layer bryophytes (Dovčiak et al, 2006), small terrestrial mammals (Gitzen et al, 2007) and saproxylic beetles (Jonsell and Weslien, 2003). Since the retention of structural attributes has not been practised for very long, short-term responses (assumption 1) are documented better than the long-term responses (assumption 2).…”
Section: Retention Of Old-growth Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most research examining responses to partial harvesting in the boreal has focussed on biodiversity, specifically looking at how levels of retention affect taxa of conservation or ecological concern, such as small mammals (Moses and Boutin 2001, Fisher and Bradbury 2006), birds (Lance and Phinney 2001, insects (Gandhi et al 2004, Deans et al 2005, Martikainen et al 2006, ectomycorrhizal fungi (Dahlberg et al 2001, Lazaruk et al 2005, understorey plants Vanha-Majamaa 2001, Bradbury 2004), and coarse woody debris, an important habitat substrate (Deans et al 2003, Lilja et al 2005. Most studies find that partial cuts maintain levels of biodiversity higher than those found in clearcuts but lower than those of uncut stands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it remains to be determined to what extent such treatments emulate the structural variation important to biodiversity (see Deans et al 2005, for example).…”
Section: Discussion Diameter Distributions As a Coarse Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%