2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge effects in lacunarity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A cellular automaton was designed for a finite number of l × l patches on a two-dimensional homogeneous patchy habitat with synchronous updating. A periodic boundary condition is adopted to avoid the edge effect (Sayama, 2004;Feagin et al, 2007), which is essentially equal to organize the patch on a globe. Simulation will be implemented according to two frameworks: the probability transition model (PTM) and the discrete event model (DEM).…”
Section: Spatially Explicit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cellular automaton was designed for a finite number of l × l patches on a two-dimensional homogeneous patchy habitat with synchronous updating. A periodic boundary condition is adopted to avoid the edge effect (Sayama, 2004;Feagin et al, 2007), which is essentially equal to organize the patch on a globe. Simulation will be implemented according to two frameworks: the probability transition model (PTM) and the discrete event model (DEM).…”
Section: Spatially Explicit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Cheng [12]points out, lacunarity analysis may be skewed by edge effects when quantifying a finite pattern. The problem occurs because as the gliding-box of size r is moved about the pattern, the values around the edges are under-sampled by the gliding-box, due to the fact that the gliding-box cannot overlap beyond the edge of the pattern.…”
Section: Lacunarity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacunarity was calculated for each test drift using the gliding-box algorithm outlined above, from Formula (7) to (12), with a range of moving-window sizes varying from r =1m up to r =20m. The algorithm of lacunarity was plotted against the gliding box size, as illustrated in Fig.3.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Hurst and Launarity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the fractal dimension (D) measures the set's space-filling ability (Mandelbrot, 1982); the degree of its translation invariance is quantified by lacunarity (Pendleton et al, 2005;Feagin, 2003;Feagin et al, 2007); the continuity and tortuosity of the pore and solid networks are measured by random-walk fractal dimensions (Korvin, 1992;Rodriguez-Iturbe and Rinaldo, 1997), or spectral dimension or fracton (Orbach, 1986). The main advantages and problems of fractal descriptor measurements have been described in details in some by now standard (Korvin, 1992;Barton and La Pointe, 1995;Falconer, 1997;Turcotte, 1997, etc.…”
Section: Measurement Techniques Of Fractal Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%