2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge-Orientation Entropy Predicts Preference for Diverse Types of Man-Made Images

Abstract: We recently found that luminance edges are more evenly distributed across orientations in large subsets of traditional artworks, i.e., artworks are characterized by a relatively high entropy of edge orientations, when compared to several categories of other (non-art) images. In the present study, we asked whether edge-orientation entropy is associated with aesthetic preference in a wide variety of other man-made visual patterns and scenes. In the first (exploratory) part of the study, participants rated the ae… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because straight lines represent exactly one orientation and curved lines comprise many orientations, Entropy and curved/angular shape relate to each other. Grebenkina et al (2018) reported that the two features share a large portion of predicted variance for preference ratings. For ratings of how pleasing and harmonious particular stimuli are, edge orientation entropy turned out to be a more powerful predictor than curvilinearity; in other words, shape was not the decisive feature that determined the aesthetic rating, but it was partially overridden by edge-orientation entropy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because straight lines represent exactly one orientation and curved lines comprise many orientations, Entropy and curved/angular shape relate to each other. Grebenkina et al (2018) reported that the two features share a large portion of predicted variance for preference ratings. For ratings of how pleasing and harmonious particular stimuli are, edge orientation entropy turned out to be a more powerful predictor than curvilinearity; in other words, shape was not the decisive feature that determined the aesthetic rating, but it was partially overridden by edge-orientation entropy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a larger 1st-order entropy of edge orientations coincides with higher arousal ratings in all datasets. This measure assumes high values in traditional artworks (Redies et al, 2017) and is positively correlated with ratings for pleasing and interesting in photographs of building facades, but less so in other visual patterns, such as music CD covers (Grebenkina et al, 2018). Third, the left/right and up/down symmetry ratings correlate with valence and arousal ratings in all datasets, underlining the importance of (a)symmetry in esthetic perception (Jacobsen and Höfel, 2002;Gartus and Leder, 2013;Wright et al, 2017).…”
Section: Datasets Differ In Which Image Properties Predict the Affectmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, in the study by Sidhu et al (2018), predicted variances ranged from 4% (for beauty ratings of abstract art) to 30% (for liking rating of representational art). Grebenkina et al (2018) reported predicted variances between 5% (for pleasing ratings of CD album covers) and 55% (for liking ratings of building facade photographs). Schwabe et al (2018) analyzed abstract artworks and non-artistic images and obtained predicted variances that ranged from 27 to 46% for ratings of how harmonious and ordered the images were, respectively.…”
Section: Prediction Of Affective Ratings By Global Image Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations