2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edible insect as an alternative protein source: a review on the chemistry and functionalities of proteins under different processing methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports on functionality of insect proteins vary with species and are scattered. Defatting is a common pre-treatment, and the choice of defatting solvent, as well as the choice of extraction procedure affect the solubility and functionality of insect protein (Queiroz et al, 2023) [61]. Mishyna et al (2021) [53] demonstrated that protein concentrates of mealworm (T. molitor), cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus), and locust (Schistocerca gregaria) had water-holding capacity and oil-holding capacity up to 300% greater than their respective raw flours.…”
Section: Edible Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reports on functionality of insect proteins vary with species and are scattered. Defatting is a common pre-treatment, and the choice of defatting solvent, as well as the choice of extraction procedure affect the solubility and functionality of insect protein (Queiroz et al, 2023) [61]. Mishyna et al (2021) [53] demonstrated that protein concentrates of mealworm (T. molitor), cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus), and locust (Schistocerca gregaria) had water-holding capacity and oil-holding capacity up to 300% greater than their respective raw flours.…”
Section: Edible Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mishyna et al (2021) [53] demonstrated that protein concentrates of mealworm (T. molitor), cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus), and locust (Schistocerca gregaria) had water-holding capacity and oil-holding capacity up to 300% greater than their respective raw flours. H. ilucens was reported to have a great foaming capacity, increasing up to 1080% after thermal treatment (Queiroz et al, 2023) [61], while A. mellifera (Mishyna et al, 2019) [62], A. domesticus, T. molitor, Z. morio, A. diaperinus, B. dubia exhibited poor foaming properties (Yi et al, 2013) [52]. On the other hand, A. domesticus exhibited far better gelling properties than other insects (Queiroz et al, 2023) [61].…”
Section: Edible Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite such advantages, the psychological aversion of consumers renders it challenging to use insects as food resources ( Megido et al, 2016 ). Therefore, removing their semblance by processing them into powder or protein concentrate has improved consumer acceptance considerably ( Borges et al, 2022 ; Queiroz et al, 2023 ). However, using insect powder in food processing often deteriorates rheological properties of food.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entomophagy has recently been suggested as a possible solution for the global protein shortage by many authors as e.g. Queiroz et al, (2023). Compared with conventional farm animals, edible insects produce less greenhouse gases and ammonia, require minimal farmland, and consume less water (Moruzzo et al, 2021;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%