2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1544-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Characteristics and collaboration analysis

Abstract: Monographs and edited books are important in scholarly communication, especially in the Social Sciences and Humanities (Gorraiz, Purnell, & Glänzel, 2013;Nederhof, 2006). An edited book is a collection of chapters written by different authors, gathered and harmonized by one or more editors. This article analyses the characteristics and collaboration patterns of edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities as practiced in Flanders, the Northern Dutch speaking part of Belgium. It is based upon a comprehens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Overall, editorship is especially important in the humanities as more than 1 in 10 researchers have edited one or more edited books, in contrast with the social sciences where only 1 in 30 researchers are book editors. Moreover, in response to our first research question, whether editors are more likely to be established researchers than are other researchers, we found that in the humanities both established and nonestablished researchers edit books, whereas in The picture emerging of the typical book editor is that of a significantly more productive researcher as regards monographs and book chapters, and having more fractional weighted publications overall, answering our second research question, about whether editors are more productive than other researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3 Overall, editorship is especially important in the humanities as more than 1 in 10 researchers have edited one or more edited books, in contrast with the social sciences where only 1 in 30 researchers are book editors. Moreover, in response to our first research question, whether editors are more likely to be established researchers than are other researchers, we found that in the humanities both established and nonestablished researchers edit books, whereas in The picture emerging of the typical book editor is that of a significantly more productive researcher as regards monographs and book chapters, and having more fractional weighted publications overall, answering our second research question, about whether editors are more productive than other researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 For the purpose of the current article, we understand the diversity of a researcher's network as the number of unique co-authors. Other interpretations of diversity exist; see Rafols and Meyer 44 for an overview.…”
Section: Co-authorship and Co-editorship Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations