2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editor's Choice – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Institutional and Surgeon Procedure Volume on Outcomes After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Abstract: Institutional and surgeon volume metrics have been discussed widely, but there has been no systematic review compiling data on ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. Meta-analysis of 13 studies reporting a total of 120 116 patients with rAAA showed that patients treated in low volume institutions have a higher perioperative mortality that those treated in high volume institutions. Adjusted analysis showed a benefit of treatment in high volume centres for open, but not for endovascular, repair. Surge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors demonstrated also that high-volume surgeons decreased the risk of mortality as well (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25–0.66). The findings are similar to those observed after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, in which hospital volume, but not surgeon’s volume, had a significant impact on perioperative mortality [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These authors demonstrated also that high-volume surgeons decreased the risk of mortality as well (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25–0.66). The findings are similar to those observed after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, in which hospital volume, but not surgeon’s volume, had a significant impact on perioperative mortality [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In multivariable-adjusted models, patients treated at low-volume centers had a greater mortality risk for open repair (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.21–2.33]) but not endovascular repair (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.84–2.41]). 139 In the United States, data from NIS showed that the risk of death after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in low-volume hospitals was significantly greater than at high-volume hospitals (OR, 1.921 [95% CI, 1.458–2.532]; P <0.001). 140 Racial disparities in perioperative 30-day mortality after TAA repair appear to be present with open (Black people, 18% versus White people, 10%; P <0.001) compared with endovascular (8% versus 9%; P =0.54) approaches on the basis of Medicare data from 1999 to 2007.…”
Section: Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In multivariable-adjusted models, patients treated at low-volume centers had a greater mortality risk for open repair (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.21–2.33]) but not endovascular repair (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.84–2.41]). 139…”
Section: Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In multivariable-adjusted models, patients treated at low-volume centers had a greater mortality risk for open repair (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.21–2.33]) but not endovascular repair (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.84–2.41]). 140 In the United States, data from NIS showed that the risk of death after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in low-volume hospitals was significantly greater than at high-volume hospitals (OR, 1.921 [95% CI, 1.458–2.532]; P <0.001). 141…”
Section: Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%