2019
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Advancements in Biomass Feedstock Preprocessing: Conversion Ready Feedstocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,22−25 Biomass variability has proven a formidable challenge to downstream processing in the emerging biorefining industry, impeding feeding operations and reducing conversion yields and selectivity. 26 The U.S. DOE's Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) assembled a team to identify the key challenges faced by the industry. These challenges centered around feedstock variability, feeding and handling of solid materials, process scaleup, and valorization of waste and coproduct streams.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,22−25 Biomass variability has proven a formidable challenge to downstream processing in the emerging biorefining industry, impeding feeding operations and reducing conversion yields and selectivity. 26 The U.S. DOE's Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) assembled a team to identify the key challenges faced by the industry. These challenges centered around feedstock variability, feeding and handling of solid materials, process scaleup, and valorization of waste and coproduct streams.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass variability has proven a formidable challenge to downstream processing in the emerging biorefining industry, impeding feeding operations and reducing conversion yields and selectivity . The U.S. DOE’s Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) assembled a team to identify the key challenges faced by the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second-generation biofuels (2GB), which were developed as a solution to some of the drawbacks associated with 1GB, can be produced from inedible feedstocks like waste cooking oil [127], waste animal fats [128], recovered oil [129], and lignocellulosic biomass, like grass, wood, sugarcane bagasse, agricultural residues, forest residues, and municipal solid waste [130,131], as well as from bioethanol, biodiesel, biosyngass, biomass to liquid biodiesel conversion, bio-oil, biohydrogen, bioalcohols, biodimethylfuran, and bio-Fischer-Tropsch [115,132]. The generation of 2GB does not affect the food chain and the cost of feedstocks is relatively low, but the production technologies are still complex and have not been commercialized yet [98,133].…”
Section: Second-generation Biofuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (7) calculates the in-feed rate based on the physical dimensions of a bale, its density, and conveyor speed. Constraint (8) ensures that every bale is processed. β + t and β − t calculate the change of reactor feeding rate from one period to the next.…”
Section: Continuous Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, investors are becoming reluctant to invest in the biofuel industry due to the high risks stemming from variability of biomass characteristics, market, and supply chain [7]. Sustainable operations of a biorefinery under biomass variations remains a challenge [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%