2002
DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.6.757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all single parameters used to calculate the MEAF might be influenced by the ischemic period during organ preservation, liver graft quality, coagulation factor substitutions and blood or plasma transfusions, as well as nutrition. Thus, evaluation of the actual parenchymal function and precise distinction between a toxic and hypoxic liver injury can be challenging (Hickman et al 1997; Shaked et al 1997; Tanaka et al 2000; Sear 2002) since routine parameters may rather reflect pre- and perioperative liver cell injury due to ischemia and organ preservation than the residual metabolic capacity of the transplanted liver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all single parameters used to calculate the MEAF might be influenced by the ischemic period during organ preservation, liver graft quality, coagulation factor substitutions and blood or plasma transfusions, as well as nutrition. Thus, evaluation of the actual parenchymal function and precise distinction between a toxic and hypoxic liver injury can be challenging (Hickman et al 1997; Shaked et al 1997; Tanaka et al 2000; Sear 2002) since routine parameters may rather reflect pre- and perioperative liver cell injury due to ischemia and organ preservation than the residual metabolic capacity of the transplanted liver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%