2020
DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on English language learning in primary schools

Abstract: The early introduction of foreign languages, mainly English, in pre-primary and primary education in different parts of the world is an undisputable fact in today’s world, as clearly illustrated in Enever (2018). One of the reasons for this educational change is the belief in “the earlier the better” notion, which has already been shown not to hold true when linguistic outcomes are assessed in foreign language settings (see García Mayo & García Lecumberri, 2003; Huang, 2015). Age is just one variable among… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reformulations seem to offer more opportunities than models for deeper processing (Kim & Bowles 2019) and noticing of language problems (Yang & Zhang, 2010). Research has found that this type of WCF contributes to learners' improvement of their writing, working either individually (Qi & Lapkin, 2001) or on CW tasks (Coyle et al, 2020;García, 2011).…”
Section: Written Feedback: Models and Reformulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, reformulations seem to offer more opportunities than models for deeper processing (Kim & Bowles 2019) and noticing of language problems (Yang & Zhang, 2010). Research has found that this type of WCF contributes to learners' improvement of their writing, working either individually (Qi & Lapkin, 2001) or on CW tasks (Coyle et al, 2020;García, 2011).…”
Section: Written Feedback: Models and Reformulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clear gap in the literature regarding research on the comparison between these two types of WCF, specifically when used by primary school FL learners when they produce a text in collaboration. Reformulations and models have been explored with younger learners in comparison to a control group (Cánovas Guirao, 2011;García, 2011) or comparatively with adults (Hanaoka & Izumi, 2012) but there is a dearth of research comparing these two types of WCF among children (Coyle & Roca de Larios, 2014). In fact, Li and Vuono (2019) call for more studies on the effect of different feedback types on different age groups, especially children.…”
Section: Written Feedback: Models and Reformulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%