2012
DOI: 10.18352/ulr.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial<br>Highest Courts and Transnational Interaction: Introductory and Concluding Remarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, courts from new democracies tend to cross-cite more often than older courts do. 75 Another example is regional networks. Courts in some regions, such as the EU, have a stronger incentive to interact with each other.…”
Section: A Increase In the Extent Of Interaction Among Organisations mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, courts from new democracies tend to cross-cite more often than older courts do. 75 Another example is regional networks. Courts in some regions, such as the EU, have a stronger incentive to interact with each other.…”
Section: A Increase In the Extent Of Interaction Among Organisations mentioning
confidence: 99%