2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Multitasking: Executive Functioning in Dual-Task and Task Switching Situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No mediation effect or moderation effect, however, was found. The finding that the Dual Task was the only test that was significantly related to work performance, could perhaps be explained by the fact that dual-task performance is associated with task-switching [78,79], an activity that people often engage in while working.…”
Section: Work Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No mediation effect or moderation effect, however, was found. The finding that the Dual Task was the only test that was significantly related to work performance, could perhaps be explained by the fact that dual-task performance is associated with task-switching [78,79], an activity that people often engage in while working.…”
Section: Work Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…close encounters) is held constant across load levels, the hypothesized patterns differ whether load and crowding rely on the same or different mechanisms: a) expected pattern for the load effect being given by the amount of crowding; b) expected pattern for a load-crowding model with independent mechanisms; c) expected pattern for a load-crowding model with shared mechanisms. This would be expected because the two loading factors would act as "dual-tasks" (Strobach et al, 2018;Williges & Wierwille, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task switching paradigms have been used to examine the effect of practice on reducing cognitive control costs associated with transitions between tasks or "switch costs". Switch costs are thought to reflect cognitive control processes involved in taskset reconfiguration, defined as the mental processes necessary to change cognitive state to prepare for a new task, or processes involved in overcoming task-set inertia, defined as interference caused by the task-set from the previous trial (Berryhill & Hughes, 2009;Draheim, Dreisbach, 2019;Strobach, Wendt, & Janczyk, 2018). Switch costs are observed in increases in reaction times and error rates on trials where participants switch tasks, relative to those where they repeat tasks (for a review: Monsell, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%