2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731116001142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Precision livestock farming: a ‘per animal’ approach using advanced monitoring technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, when it comes to the monitoring of the health, activity and welfare of chickens, currently available methods and systems cannot meet the increasing technical, administrative, and organisational requirements of ever-growing farms, which limits the possibility and feasibility of monitoring their livestock (Halachmi and Guarino, 2016). Thirdly, when targeting health and disease monitoring, clinical signs such as nasal discharge and diarrhoea are non-specific and cannot be used as evidence in diagnosis (Rahimian et al, 2012); and advanced diagnostic methods including ELISA and real-time RT-PCR are only useful when daily monitoring shows the necessity, because of their requirements for expert personnel, expensive equipment, and time-consuming and costly processes (Soltan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Biosensors For Animal Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, when it comes to the monitoring of the health, activity and welfare of chickens, currently available methods and systems cannot meet the increasing technical, administrative, and organisational requirements of ever-growing farms, which limits the possibility and feasibility of monitoring their livestock (Halachmi and Guarino, 2016). Thirdly, when targeting health and disease monitoring, clinical signs such as nasal discharge and diarrhoea are non-specific and cannot be used as evidence in diagnosis (Rahimian et al, 2012); and advanced diagnostic methods including ELISA and real-time RT-PCR are only useful when daily monitoring shows the necessity, because of their requirements for expert personnel, expensive equipment, and time-consuming and costly processes (Soltan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Biosensors For Animal Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop and horticultural production have for the last number of years witnessed an explosion of new software systems, monitoring devices and machines that exploit the latest capabilities in sensing, communication, processing and power management (van Evert et al, 2017). Since the early 1990s, livestock production has also started to see more research into ICT-supported management of livestock farming systems (Halachmi and Guarino, 2016). Much of the initial developments focused on decision support systems, that is, to simulate many scenarios that affect the economic or sustainability indicators of production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these terms, the use of a milk analysis system in real time for each individual cow will be a useful way to monitor modern dairy farms [8] . This is part of the management system known as Precision Livestock Farming (PLF), which aims to do the right thing at the right time [9] and outlines a new approach to the application of advanced technologies in the livestock sector [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%