2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: The Social Nature of Emotions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While some emotions were rated similarly on both scales (love and compassion were rated as highly positive to experience and highly prosocial), others were rated orthogonally (grief and humiliation were both highly negative to experience but neither prosocial nor antisocial). In line with wider approaches to the study of emotion, we show they are considered socially as well as in relation to individual experience (Parkinson, 1996;van Kleef et al, 2016). Most importantly, the results showed none of the emotion terms that have commonly been included as negative secondary emotions within the infrahumanisation literature, such as guilt, remorse, shame, disappointment, and melancholy (e.g., were perceived to be antisocial, though they were considered negative to experience.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…While some emotions were rated similarly on both scales (love and compassion were rated as highly positive to experience and highly prosocial), others were rated orthogonally (grief and humiliation were both highly negative to experience but neither prosocial nor antisocial). In line with wider approaches to the study of emotion, we show they are considered socially as well as in relation to individual experience (Parkinson, 1996;van Kleef et al, 2016). Most importantly, the results showed none of the emotion terms that have commonly been included as negative secondary emotions within the infrahumanisation literature, such as guilt, remorse, shame, disappointment, and melancholy (e.g., were perceived to be antisocial, though they were considered negative to experience.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Judgments of meanings of facial and bodily expressions can be guided by perceptual expertise, where observers compare diagnostic features of a given expression to their stored representations of different emotion categories (Smith et al, 2005;Folstein et al, 2012). Moreover, interpretation of others' displays is often informed by the context in which a given expression occurs, as characteristics of the expresser, perceiver, and the situation provide cues about people's emotions and behavioral intentions (van Kleef et al, 2016;Hess and Hareli, 2017;Greenaway et al, 2018). Compared to these processes, sensorimotor simulation of emotion displays is predicted to partially or fully reactivate affective states and bodily changes associated with experiencing a given feeling.…”
Section: Embodied Simulation and Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving beyond the classic questions of what emotions are, how they arise, and what they represent, contemporary theorizing and research increasingly emphasize the socialcommunicative functions and effects of emotional expressions (e.g., Fischer & Manstead, 2016;Keltner & Haidt, 1999;Parkinson, 1996;Planalp, 1999;Van Kleef, Cheshin, Fischer, & Schneider, 2016). The latest contribution to this literature is the "pragmatic" approach advocated by Andrea Scarantino (this issue), which aims to illuminate the socialcommunicative properties of emotional expressions by drawing an analogy with formal language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%