2018
DOI: 10.1080/17539153.2018.1456727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editors’ introduction: drones and state terrorism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to the potential for 'neoprotectionism' (Büscher and Fletcher 2020), I would argue that the distancing of the researcher from the ecosystem may have implications for their relations and perspective of rural communities living close to nature. Similar to the use of drones in warfare, distancing may make it easier to advocate for more coercive conservation approaches (Espinoza and Afxentiou 2018;Gregory 2017). Without field immersion and interaction with neighboring communities, conservationists may more readily advocate for sovereign environmentalities (Fletcher 2010) applied to human populations to curb rising extinction threats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the potential for 'neoprotectionism' (Büscher and Fletcher 2020), I would argue that the distancing of the researcher from the ecosystem may have implications for their relations and perspective of rural communities living close to nature. Similar to the use of drones in warfare, distancing may make it easier to advocate for more coercive conservation approaches (Espinoza and Afxentiou 2018;Gregory 2017). Without field immersion and interaction with neighboring communities, conservationists may more readily advocate for sovereign environmentalities (Fletcher 2010) applied to human populations to curb rising extinction threats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%