Reviews in Digital Humanities 2020
DOI: 10.21428/3e88f64f.c15f1580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editors' Note: December 2020

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…publications are being established within different fields and amongst different scholarly communities. Guidelines focused on evaluating works on their own merits, in the media they are produced, in an ongoing manner, and including technical, design, computational, and interface elements in their evaluation-including reviews of digital humanities projects, archives, tools, and resources (Anderson & McPherson, 2011;Risam, 2014;Guiliano & Risam, 2019;Nyhan, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…publications are being established within different fields and amongst different scholarly communities. Guidelines focused on evaluating works on their own merits, in the media they are produced, in an ongoing manner, and including technical, design, computational, and interface elements in their evaluation-including reviews of digital humanities projects, archives, tools, and resources (Anderson & McPherson, 2011;Risam, 2014;Guiliano & Risam, 2019;Nyhan, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%