2015
DOI: 10.2465/jmps.141126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EDS quantification of light elements using osmium surface coating

Abstract: This study demonstrates the validity of a thin osmium coating for quantitative energy-dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) analysis, particularly for light elements such as O (and potentially C and N) in natural/synthetic minerals. An osmium coating prepared by chemical vapor deposition provides an extremely thin and uniform layer whose thickness can be controlled simply by coating time. Because of the high reproducibility and reliability of the osmium coating process, users have no difficulty in evaluating the actu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has previously been technically difficult to accurately quantify light elements such as C and N by EDS due to high attenuation nature of the lowenergy characteristic X-rays in the volume excited by electron beam. However, we recently demonstrated that a surface conductive coating of thin osmium layer is effective for EDS quantitative analysis particularly of light elements such as C, N, and O in both inorganic and organic materials [7,38]. The validity of this method for carbon nitride analysis was indeed shown in Kojima and Ohfuji [7], in which the accuracy of quantification for C and N was evaluated to be less than 0.5%.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has previously been technically difficult to accurately quantify light elements such as C and N by EDS due to high attenuation nature of the lowenergy characteristic X-rays in the volume excited by electron beam. However, we recently demonstrated that a surface conductive coating of thin osmium layer is effective for EDS quantitative analysis particularly of light elements such as C, N, and O in both inorganic and organic materials [7,38]. The validity of this method for carbon nitride analysis was indeed shown in Kojima and Ohfuji [7], in which the accuracy of quantification for C and N was evaluated to be less than 0.5%.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pure SiC and cubic BN standards with the same surface coating were used for quantitative calibration of carbon and nitrogen, respectively. Measurements were made carefully by beam-scanning on each target area of the products (at 1 nA and 15 kV) to avoid potential damage by the electron beam [38], which might result in modification of the C/N ratio. Since EDS cannot technically detect hydrogen, the amount of hydrogen in the products was estimated from the result of the combustion analysis.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The homogeneity of the nitride products was investigated by employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-7000F and JSM-IT500HR, JEOL), while the elemental composition was examined by employing energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (INCA E250, Oxford Instruments). FeS 2 , Re, and BN were used as EDX standards for the quantification of Fe, Re, and N, respectively . A 5 nm layer of a conductive Pt coating was deposited on the polished sample surface to enhance the conductivity of the sample so that a high-quality SEM analysis could be performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FeS 2 , Re, and BN were used as EDX standards for the quantification of Fe, Re, and N, respectively. 39 A 5 nm layer of a conductive Pt coating was deposited on the polished sample surface to enhance the conductivity of the sample so that a high-quality SEM analysis could be performed. The magnetic properties were measured by employing VSM (MicroSense-VSM-EV9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure CeO 2 and NaCl were used as the EDX standards for the quantification of Ce, O, and Cl, respectively. The accuracy of the quantification was estimated to be no more than 0.5%. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) was carried out to confirm the crystal structure.…”
Section: Experimental and Calculation Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%