“…To account for potential reversed causality, we run our analyses with a time lag of 1 year as we cannot exclude that more innovative firms are more likely to appoint women to their boards or that women self‐select onto the boards of more innovative firms (see Bendig, 2022; Dittmann et al, 2010; and Farrell & Hersch, 2005, for a similar procedure). To further account for reversed causality, we include a two‐year lead as well as a one‐year lead of women − percent, women shareholder side − percent , and women employee side − percent to test for strict exogeneity (see, e.g., Engle et al, 1983; Hsieh et al, 2022; Jeong & Harrison, 2017). We find the corresponding explanatory variables for women directors to be exogenous in all models.…”