2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10984-019-09280-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educating for innovation: students’ perceptions of the learning environment and of their own innovation competence

Abstract: Developing students' innovation competence is becoming increasingly important in higher education, yet few studies have actually investigated whether current learning environments are aimed at promoting this competence and whether students perceive that they have mastered this competence. This study aimed to map students' perceptions of the learning environment in terms of whether their schools' curricula were directed towards developing innovation competence and their perceptions of their own innovation compe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Students’ perceptions most closely correlate with teachers’ perceptions with respect to school leaders’ perceptions at all education levels, except for iVET. These findings confirm Hypothesis 3 and are in line with the literature that highlights relationships between students, teachers, and school leaders’ perception (e.g., Castaño-Muñoz et al, 2018 ) on students’ well-being and inclusion through technologies ( Walker and Logan, 2009 ; Soutter et al, 2014 ; Ovbiagbonhia et al, 2019 ). In particular, the strong relationships that emerged between students and teachers, and between teachers and school leaders highlight the importance of considering the perceptions of all the three main actors in the school community to promote well-being and inclusion ( Kampylis et al, 2015 ; OECD, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(ii) Students’ perceptions most closely correlate with teachers’ perceptions with respect to school leaders’ perceptions at all education levels, except for iVET. These findings confirm Hypothesis 3 and are in line with the literature that highlights relationships between students, teachers, and school leaders’ perception (e.g., Castaño-Muñoz et al, 2018 ) on students’ well-being and inclusion through technologies ( Walker and Logan, 2009 ; Soutter et al, 2014 ; Ovbiagbonhia et al, 2019 ). In particular, the strong relationships that emerged between students and teachers, and between teachers and school leaders highlight the importance of considering the perceptions of all the three main actors in the school community to promote well-being and inclusion ( Kampylis et al, 2015 ; OECD, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Innovation competence is not limited to learning outcomes, but teachers provide opportunities for students to further develop their personality. In line with the results of Bas & Perry (2019), states that the increase in the values of student innovation can be supported by the conditions of the learning environment. The independence of learning in gaining knowledge (Lewis & Perry, 2017).…”
Section: Perception Of Learning Through Lesson Study By Studentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Results based on micro-learning practices were key to the traditional classroom innovation. In this context, Nano-MOOC innovates traditional processes for enhanced academic performance [15], [11]; findings regarding the importance of learning environment designs from university students perspective validated the concept for better learning competencies applied to formal and informal educational processes [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Authors confirm that environmental educations support sustainable development objective-ODS-since it protects the natural environment, creates awareness and the innovation of revolutionary technological resources and also the creation of new learning environments offering new learning opportunities so that formal and informal education is supported [31], [10], [23], [30]; microlearning is taught by technological resources including key-topic short video-clips having the potential to enhance professional development and the innovation of traditional methodologies to improve academic performance [8], [15], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%