Education and training in a model of endogenous growth with creative wear-and-tear

Abstract

How does the rate at which firms adopt new technologies affect the level of education and training of a country's workforce? If technological change makes knowledge obsolete and tends to foster general rather than firm-specific skills, what would be the optimum level of education spending in front of a faster arrival of new technologies? This paper tries to answer these questions by developing an endogenous growth model with creative 'wear and tear' in which general education enhances innovation through R&D and lowers adjustment costs to new technologies, while on-the-job training is necessary for firms to realise their profit potentials by implementing the new technologies and reap all the related future quasi-rents. The paper reproduces some stylized facts on the technology-training relationship and shows how the optimum amount of time devoted to education and job training is affected by the rate of technical change itself. In particular, we find that a faster arrival of innovations shifts the private knowledge portfolio towards general human capital. We also find that households tend to under invest in education, thus leading to lower growth rates than technically feasible, and higher training costs than absolutely necessary. This suggests that there is room for education policy reducing private education fees.

Education as a Long‐Term Investment: The Decisive Role of Age in the Education‐Growth Relationship

“…There are several reasons to believe that the productivity differential between more and less educated individuals may increase with time, at least until a certain age. Some recent theoretical growth models (Marconi and De Grip, ; Van Zon and Antonietti, ) assume that education increases individual productivity mainly by enhancing individuals’ ability to learn by doing or through on‐the‐job training. This is also implicit in the literature on dynamic human capital, suggesting that “an ability to ‘learn’ (whether innate or acquired through ‘learning to learn’ in academic settings)” is a necessary condition to develop valuable types of human capital (Gordon, , p. 1045).…”

The effect of training on Italian firms’ productivity: microeconomic and macroeconomic perspectives

“…From a theoretical point of view, the applied macroeconomic literature reviewed above is consistent with an endogenous growth framework in which human capitalin the form of on-the-job training -and innovations are the main economic development drivers (van Zon & Antonietti, 2005). The straightforward implication of this framework that I will test below across EU members is that countries in which firms are less prone to provide vocational training are likely to display unsatisfying performances at the macro level.…”

Household demand for private tutoring in Tunisia

“…Education has been considered to be a major factor for social and economic growth (Becker, 1962). There has been extensive analysis of education, including endogenous growth models and microeconomic analyses via measurements of investing in education (Zon and Antonietti, 2016;Paganetto and Scandizzo, 2003). In fact, education boosts the productivity of individuals and their lifetime earnings (Becker, 1993).…”