Education Students’ Use of Collaborative Writing Tools in Collectively Reflective Essay Papers

Abstract

Google Docs and EtherPad are Web 2.0 tools providing opportunity for multiple users to work online on the same document consecutively or simultaneously. Over the last few years a number of research papers on the use of these collaborative tools in a teaching and learning environment have been published. This work builds on that of Brodahl, Hadjerrouit, and Hansen (2011) expanding its case study. The theoretical framework is the same as the one underlying Brodahl et al. (2011), drawing on two learning theories, the social-constructivist learning theory and the community of practice, and their relationships to collaborative tools. The literature review is extended to cover the recent research work in the field, related to Web 2.0 technologies in higher education.The case study of Brodahl et al. (2011) involved 201 education students who had just begun their four-year initial teacher education. However, 24 students are omitted in the current work, and the result tables from Brodahl et al. (2011) accordantly updated. Disregarding particular groups of students was due to their specific local dispersion, as they conducted their entire assignment and collectively reflective essay paper at the same physical location and, with respect to this, reported the use of collaborative tools as superfluous and unwanted in their setting.Partly based on the same survey, this work presents a case study investigating education students' perceptions of collaborative writing reflective essay papers. However, where Brodahl et al. (2011) presented a solely quantitative study derived from closed-ended questions, this work incorporates the survey's open-ended questions in a qualitative analysis. The analysis also draws on the students' written reflections on their experiences.The qualitative analysis supports the conclusion of Brodahl et al. (2011) that technical problems were a major issue, mostly related to EtherPad. All but one complaint about technical difficulties stemmed from EtherPad users during a limited period of time. Other major negative feedback concerned group size; several groups pointed out difficulties with organizing the work, problems of Material published as part of this publication, either on-line or in print, is copyrighted by the Informing Science Institute. Permission to make digital or paper copy of part or all of these works for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage AND that copies 1) bear this notice in full and 2) give the full citation on the first page. It is permissible to abstract these works so long as credit is given. To copy in all other cases or to republish or to post on a server or to redistribute to lists requires specific permission and payment of a fee. Contact Publisher@InformingScience.org to request redistribution permission.Education Students' Use of Collaborative Writing Tools keeping track when editing simultaneously, and failure to produce a unified document. Positive issues frequently m...

Google Docs as a Tool for Collaborative Writing in the Middle School Classroom

“…These students reported that the tool helped them communicate more easily with one another and write with less anxiety. However, such promising results would not be possible without first training students to use the technology, as familiarity with the tools is a key factor in student perception of the collaboration (Brodahl, & Hansen, 2014). Some findings were less positive.…”

A Container Orchestration Development that Optimizes the Etherpad Collaborative Editing Tool through a Novel Management System

“…Brodahl and Hansen [17] proposed the use of a text editor in academic environments. Google Docs and Etherpad Web 2.0 are tools that provide the opportunity for multiple users to work online in the same document consecutively and concurrently.…”

“…From the academic point of view, the use of online and collaborative tools gives enhanced feedback to students. It is intended to improve academic performance, and it may be used as an option in pedagogical design [17,29].…”

Students’ Perceptions Towards Using Web 2.0 Technologies in Education

“…WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES: EDUCATIONAL ADVANTAGES AND DRAWBACKS Most of the studies conducted on Web 2.0 technologies and their impact on education have reported that these tools have many advantages [6,7]. One major benefit of these platforms is that they can serve as collaborative and knowledge platforms via which community members can share their knowledge with the group, post information, work together, and critically discuss issues [8].…”