2017
DOI: 10.28945/3870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Google Docs as a Tool for Collaborative Writing in the Middle School Classroom

Abstract: Aim/Purpose: In this study, the authors examine how an online word processing tool can be used to encourage participation among students of different language back-grounds, including English Language Learners. To be exact, the paper discusses whether student participation in anonymous collaborative writing via Google Docs can lead to more successful products in a linguistically diverse eighth-grade English Language Arts classroom. Background: English Language Learners (ELLs) make up a considerable portion of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in line with Jeong (2016) who states that through Google Docs, "students could get instant feedback both from the instructor and from their peers" (p. 4). In addition, the results were in agreement with Zhou et al (2012) and Woodrich and Fan (2017) who mentioned that Google Docs is a useful tool for collaborative learning and is enjoyed by students. Despite the fact that Jeong (2016), Zhou et al (2012), and Woodrich and Fan (2017) implemented Google Docs for EFL writing purposes as opposed to learning grammar, the fact that such tool is beneficial in providing feedback and supporting a collaborative approach to learning was highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results are in line with Jeong (2016) who states that through Google Docs, "students could get instant feedback both from the instructor and from their peers" (p. 4). In addition, the results were in agreement with Zhou et al (2012) and Woodrich and Fan (2017) who mentioned that Google Docs is a useful tool for collaborative learning and is enjoyed by students. Despite the fact that Jeong (2016), Zhou et al (2012), and Woodrich and Fan (2017) implemented Google Docs for EFL writing purposes as opposed to learning grammar, the fact that such tool is beneficial in providing feedback and supporting a collaborative approach to learning was highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Penyebab rendahnya hasil belajar yaitu pemilihan metode dan media pembelajaran yang digunakan oleh guru pada proses pembelajaran sangat kurang tepat dan pengelolaan kegiatan pembelajaran yang masih belum dapat membangkitkan motivasi belajar siswa secara optimal (Gumrowi, 2016). Media sendiri adalah sebagai alat komunikasi guna lebih mengefektifkan proses belajar mengajar (Mahbub, Kirana, & Poedjiastoeti, 2016;Woodrich & Fan, 2017). Manfaat dari penggunaan media ini diharapkan mampu menarik perhatian siswa dan memudahkan siswa dalam memahami materi (Eko Purwanto, Hendri, & Susanti, 2016).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Likewise, Storch (2005) claims, in his experimental study, the participants write better collaboratively than individually. Although Seyyedrezaie et al (2016) got the students' negative reactions of using Google Docs for collaboration for various reasons, Woodrich and Fan (2017) stated that using Google Docs may open a door for non-attentive students based on their positive reactions despite no evidence of better-quality works of collaborative tasks than individual tasks. Similarly, Kongchan (2013) investigated students' and a teacher's perceptions of using Google Docs and Edmodo collaboratively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%