1972
DOI: 10.1177/174114327200100107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Administration in the University of Bristol School of Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). The Poisson's ratio values were previously measured and ranged between −0.7 and −0.2 , in agreement with the figures calculated by Grima and Gatt . The working pressure for the water‐jet cutting was 55 000 psi, with a jet size of ±1.15 mm, accuracy of ±0.127 mm per 1 m and speed of 101.6 mm min −1 .…”
Section: Manufacturing and Testing Of The Plates And The Auxetic Foamsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…). The Poisson's ratio values were previously measured and ranged between −0.7 and −0.2 , in agreement with the figures calculated by Grima and Gatt . The working pressure for the water‐jet cutting was 55 000 psi, with a jet size of ±1.15 mm, accuracy of ±0.127 mm per 1 m and speed of 101.6 mm min −1 .…”
Section: Manufacturing and Testing Of The Plates And The Auxetic Foamsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The analysis was done with a 95% confidence level, hence a P‐ value less or equal to 0.05 (5%) means that factor has a significant effect on K . The perforation dimensions affect the stiffness response of the curved plates on their own . This phenomenon was confirmed by the DoE analysis, with a resulting P‐ value of 0.000.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations