2021
DOI: 10.1086/714773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Administration Research in Comparative Education, 1995–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review of EDLM research published in comparative education journals between 1995 and 2018 (Flessa et al, 2021) found that 68 from a total of 109 articles pertained to what they called the 'leaders' trajectory'. That review also found that most of the EDLM articles published in comparative education journals were single-country studies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Topics For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review of EDLM research published in comparative education journals between 1995 and 2018 (Flessa et al, 2021) found that 68 from a total of 109 articles pertained to what they called the 'leaders' trajectory'. That review also found that most of the EDLM articles published in comparative education journals were single-country studies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Topics For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [11] identifies management gaps and determines service quality levels based on SERVQUAL analysis, proposes a customer-oriented model of total quality management in higher education through modeling studies of explanatory structures, and determines the minimum design features that satisfy various internal and external customer requirements of the education system with the help of QFD models. The literature [12] suggests that the current educational administrative organization in China is fragmented by hierarchy, cross-functionality, lack of effective cooperation between voluntary organizations and the private sector, and unscientific performance evaluation, and advocates structural integration, functional integration, trust relationship construction, and the use of information technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facing the requirements of the new era, how to implement the fundamental task of moral education management of students in the second course, from the actual needs of local universities and students' growth, accurately grasp the characteristics and growth dynamics of students, and innovate the working mechanism based on student education management is a systematic project that needs comprehensive reform from the concept, a working mechanism to the way of realization [10]. An indepth study of the connotation of the new model of education and management of students in the second course and practice of the new system model of education is of practical significance to achieve the goal of cultivating builders and successors of all-around development [11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%