Educational Outcomes For Aboriginal School Students In Tasmania: Is The Achievement Gap Closing?

Abstract

A quality education is a basic societal right. Yet for many Aboriginal students that right is not yet a reality. This paper focuses on the situation of Aboriginal/palawa school students in Tasmania and employs a quantitative methodology to examine the comparative educational achievements of Aboriginal school students. State level Grade 3, 5, 7 and 9 numeracy and reading test results from the National Assessment Program of Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) 2008 - 2016 support the analysis. Results indicate that Aboriginal students remain more likely to be at or below minimum literacy and numeracy standards than their non-Aboriginal counterparts. It is also found that Aboriginal students’ academic achievement declines as they move through the schooling system. Further, Aboriginal students are less likely to partake in NAPLAN due to higher absenteeism on test days. These results are discussed in the context of education policy and the broader national and international literature on factors influencing academic achievement for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander school students. Despite an increasing awareness and the development of strategic policies to address Aboriginal educational inequality, it is evident that little has changed between 2008 and 2016. It is strongly argued that Aboriginal students’ underachievement is more likely tied to schooling and policy environments that do not adequately meet their needs, rather than the students themselves. As such, policies and interventions that create long term, embedded improvement of Aboriginal students’ schooling experiences and the engagement of their families and communities are a prerequisite for improving Aboriginal student outcomes.Â

Parochialism or Pragmatic Resistance? The Role of Community-engaged Leadership, Activist Scholarship, and Vulnerable Rural Ecologies within School Reform

“…Part of any SDE process, including the RERS project, would be to further develop inter-community relationships that allow for a common understanding of the often painful history of Native American assimilation (McCarty & Lee, 2015;Roppolo & Crow, 2007). It is imperative that through the SDE process community members increase their knowledge of the historic nature of their sociopolitical privilege through critical community discussions pertinent to educating stakeholders, community agents, and educators on the history and current status of nondominant communities (Gutiérrez, 2016;Stone, Walter, & Peacock, 2017), as well as the ability to support community resilience in various ethnic communities (Cheshire et al, 2015). To facilitate dialogue that reconciles power and privilege, critical scholars can participate in activist research that helps give voice to local community members, transform social and economic supports, and create third spaces that help disrupt these recursive practices of exclusion (Guajardo et al, 2008;Guajardo et al, 2017;Gutiérrez, 2016;Militello et al, 2017;Zeichner, 2010).…”

The Perennials and Trends of Rural Education

“…Parent involvement is not always reported as a positive for parents, and some articles suggest that engagement is simply an additional instrument for control and assimilation, particularly for Aboriginal students and their families (Allard & Sanderson, 2003) where historical trauma creates resistance to engagement (Duncan et al, 2022) and fails to have the desired impacts of improved student engagement in learning and better outcomes (Stone et al, 2017). From a teacher's perspective, parent involvement is sometimes seen as a "complex practice" (Zhang et al, 2021, p. 31) or difficult work.…”

Large scale implementation of effective early literacy instruction

“…Despite our advanced knowledge of facilitators of children's early literacy success, there remains wide variability in children's literacy achievement. Only modest gains (if any) are being reported in reducing educational inequities for indigenous populations, children raised in poverty or children with learning challenges (Ferrer et al, 2015;Schulte et al, 2016;Stone et al, 2017;Hanushek et al, 2022). For some children with lower level literacy skills the achievement gap compared to their peers over time may be widening (D'Agostino and Rodgers, 2017).…”