Edutool®: Un Instrumento Para La Evaluación Y Acreditación De La Calidad De Los Moocs

Baldomero, Miguel; Salmeron, Jose L.

doi:10.5944/educxx1.14597

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Agreeing with the results of Baldomero and Salmerón (2015), a platform with high quality is Coursera, being MiriadaX and UNX the ones with the lowest scores.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality indicators: developing “MOOCs” in the European Higher Education Area

Yepes-Baldó

Romeo

Piñol

et al. 2016

Educational Media International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this research is to design an integrated system of evaluation of the quality of the Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) taking into account the features of this type of courses. The criteria included in the evaluation of the quality of e-learning training in a broad sense are considered, and specifically those developed for the MOOCs. Using a quantitative, descriptive and sectional design, a team of experts have valued those indicators proposed by the scientific literature. To do this, eight courses, focusing on the field of entrepreneurship and innovation, were selected. Most of the analysed courses meet designated quality criteria by having a clear and organized academic structure. In addition, each course states clearly the timing and hours of dedication by the learner. However, only a few courses do that on the open internet and on their own academic institutions' websites. None of the MOOCs establishes the admission requirements. The main contribution of the current research is that it gives MOOC developers some quality indicators, related to course design and platform, to better plan their applied design and implementation, which has a decisive positive impact on the educational quality of such e-learning platforms.

show abstract

“…Agreeing with the results of Baldomero and Salmerón (2015), a platform with high quality is Coursera, being MiriadaX and UNX the ones with the lowest scores.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…We focused this research on the design of an integrated evaluation system of the quality of the MOOCs. Recently, some authors have developed tools to analyze this quality but they have focused on quality regulations based on the UNE 66181 (Baldomero & Salmerón, 2015). Our work goes further, since it not only includes regulatory issues but…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Quality indicators: developing “MOOCs” in the European Higher Education Area

Yepes-Baldó

Romeo

Piñol

et al. 2016

Educational Media International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Diseño de un modelo de evaluación de la calidad de los cursos MOOC mediante Lógica difusa

Baldomero

Vázquez‐Cano

Montoro

2018

REDIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La proliferación de los cursos MOOC y la formación masiva y en abierto requiere de procesos rigurosos que puedan determinar su calidad formativa. Este artículo presenta un análisis comparativo de los indicadores de evaluación de dos instrumentos de valoración de la calidad de este tipo de cursos: EduTool® y UMUMOOC. Para ello, se analizaron las ponderaciones de los subfactores de cada una de las dimensiones de los dos instrumentos mediante Lógica difusa. Una vez analizadas las fortalezas y debilidades de ambas herramientas, este estudio propone un constructo de evaluación de calidad como una pirámide de cinco vértices o representación pentadimensional. En el centro de gravedad se encontraría “el reconocimiento de la formación para la empleabilidad”. De esta manera, a partir de esta base, las herramientas de evaluación se tendrían que configurar en las dimensiones: diseño de aprendizaje, comunicación-interacción, planificación-gestión, niveles de accesibilidad y metodología de aprendizaje.

show abstract

Graphic Model of Virtual Teaching Supervision through Fuzzy Logic in Non-University Educational Centers

Falla-Falcón

López-Meneses

Ramírez-Fernández

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research analyzes the supervision of non-university virtual training due to the unexpected non-face-to-face teaching scenario caused by COVID-19 with a graphic model using the SULODITOOL® instrument. It arises as a research line of the Chair of Education and Emerging Technologies, Gamification and Artificial Intelligence of the Pablo de Olavide University (Seville) and is developed under the auspices of other assessment instruments within the framework of the functions and attributions of the Education Inspectorate of Spain. The aforementioned instrument is made up of 10 weighted supervisory indicators using fuzzy logic. The aggregation of linguistic variables of 242 expert judges was performed using the probabilistic OR function and defuzzified using the area centroid method to calculate the aforementioned weights. Based on the innovative analytical and graphic methodology used to analyze the supervision of virtual teaching, both synchronous and asynchronous, it stands out from the results obtained that there are certain supervision indicators, such as the training design and the methodology used, which should be considered as factors key in all the scenarios studied (primary education, compulsory secondary education and post-compulsory education).

show abstract

Edutool®: Un Instrumento Para La Evaluación Y Acreditación De La Calidad De Los Moocs

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Quality indicators: developing “MOOCs” in the European Higher Education Area

Quality indicators: developing “MOOCs” in the European Higher Education Area

Diseño de un modelo de evaluación de la calidad de los cursos MOOC mediante Lógica difusa

Graphic Model of Virtual Teaching Supervision through Fuzzy Logic in Non-University Educational Centers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About