2017 International Conference on Orange Technologies (ICOT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icot.2017.8336126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG-based emotion recognition using domain adaptation network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This disturbance causes the baseline EEG signals to be unable to characterize the differences in participant characteristics found in the EEG signals. There are several methods applicable to eliminate disturbance/artifacts in the EEG signals, including regression [50], wavelet transform [51], and blind source separation (BSS), which further include other techniques such as independent component analysis (ICA) usually applied for electrooculography (EOG) artifacts [5], [29] and eye blinking [52]. This ICA also has the ability to remove artifacts using statistical independence between EEG and artifacts [10].…”
Section: Rq 2: How Can An Eeg Signal Be Generated With Consideration Of Differences In Participant Characteristics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disturbance causes the baseline EEG signals to be unable to characterize the differences in participant characteristics found in the EEG signals. There are several methods applicable to eliminate disturbance/artifacts in the EEG signals, including regression [50], wavelet transform [51], and blind source separation (BSS), which further include other techniques such as independent component analysis (ICA) usually applied for electrooculography (EOG) artifacts [5], [29] and eye blinking [52]. This ICA also has the ability to remove artifacts using statistical independence between EEG and artifacts [10].…”
Section: Rq 2: How Can An Eeg Signal Be Generated With Consideration Of Differences In Participant Characteristics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the development of deep learning techniques and its usability, many works of EEG-based decoding with neural networks have been proposed. Jin et al ( 2017 ) and Li et al ( 2018 ) adopts deep adaptation network (DAN) (Long et al, 2015 ) to EEG-based emotion recognition, which takes maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) (Borgwardt et al, 2006 ) as a measure of the distance between the source and the target domain, and training to reduce it on multiple layers. Extending the original method, Chai et al proposes subspace alignment auto-encoder (SAAE) (Chai et al, 2016 ) which first projects both source and target domains into a domain-invariant subspace using an auto-encoder, and then kernel PCA, graph regularization and MMD are used to align the feature distribution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the shift between domains, adopting DA for EEG data especially when facing multiple sources is difficult. In recent years, the researchers tend to merge all source domains into one single source and then use DA to align the distribution (Source-combine DA in Figure 1 ) (Zheng and Lu, 2016 ; Jin et al, 2017 ; Li et al, 2018 , 2019a , b , 2020 ; Zheng et al, 2018 ; Zhao et al, 2021 ). This simple approach may improve the performance because it expands the training data for the model, but it ignores the non-stationary of each EEG source domain itself and disrupts it (i.e., EEG data of different people obey different marginal distributions), besides, directly merging into one new source domain cannot determine whether its new marginal distribution still obeys EEG-data distribution, thus brings a larger bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the development of deep learning techniques and its usability, many works of EEG-based decoding with neural networks have been proposed. Jin et al [27], and Li et al [28] adopts deep adaptation network (DAN) [29] to EEG-based emotion recognition, which takes maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) [30] as a measure of the distance between the source and the target domain, and training to reduce it on multiple layers. Extending the original method, Chai et al proposes subspace alignment auto-encoder (SAAE) [31] which first projects both source and target domains into a domain-invariant subspace using an auto-encoder, and then kernel PCA, graph regularization and MMD are used to align the feature distribution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%