2022
DOI: 10.25100/cm.v53i1.4873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectos de edad, periodo y cohorte en la mortalidad por cáncer de cuello uterino en Colombia entre 1985 y 2014.

Abstract: Objetivo:Analizar las tendencias de la mortalidad por cáncer de cuello uterino en Colombia, teniendo en cuenta los efectos de edad, periodo y cohorte. Métodos:Los datos de mortalidad y de población se tomaron de las bases oficiales del Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadísticas, DANE. Se ajustaron cinco modelos, la significancia de los efectos se obtuvo comparándolos a través de la prueba de razón de verosimilitud. Resultados:La tasa de mortalidad ajustada por edad, en muertes fue de 15.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, cervical cancer shows elevated incidence rates among women aged 35 to 40 and between 65 and 80 years old. In Colombia, there’s an observed secondary peak in incidence around 55 [ 42 , 43 ]. However, it has been documented that after menopause, there is a population group where HPV infections are even more frequent, surpassing the frequency observed in other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, cervical cancer shows elevated incidence rates among women aged 35 to 40 and between 65 and 80 years old. In Colombia, there’s an observed secondary peak in incidence around 55 [ 42 , 43 ]. However, it has been documented that after menopause, there is a population group where HPV infections are even more frequent, surpassing the frequency observed in other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, Colombian women diagnosed with breast cancer demonstrate a five year survival probability of 81% versus 53% for women with cervical cancer [4]. Reasons for the difference in mortality rates are not well-understood, but multiple barriers to accessing adequate care and the lack of an organized cervical cancer control program could be playing important roles [5]. Some of the barriers reported are excessive waittimes for service authorizations [6,7], lack of oncologists, lack of care standardization, and inability to access reliable and affordable transportation within rural areas are other barriers at play [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%