Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian: Studi Kasus Perkawinan Poligami

Rahman, Sufirman; Qamar, Nurul; Kamran, Muhammad

doi:10.37276/sjh.v1i2.60

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Tidak semua perkawinan memenuhi harapan untuk menciptakan kehidupan rumah of creating a peaceful, happy, harmonious, and lasting household life. Incompatibility between spouses frequently hurts their domestic life and raises concerns about the possibility of divorce (Rahman et al, 2020). Therefore, many married spouses choose to secure their marriages with prenuptial agreements as a precaution against unwanted situations.…”

Section: Pendahuluanmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Position of Premarital Property and Joint Property after Divorce: A Study of Premarital Agreement

Rimi¹

2023

sjh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine and analyze the position of the premarital property and joint property in the prenuptial agreement and the legal consequences after the divorce. This normative legal study uses a statute and comparative approaches with a literature study technique. The results show that premarital and joint property have different marital positions. Premarital property refers to property owned individually by the husband or wife before marriage. In contrast, joint property refers to property acquired during the marriage and jointly owned by husband and wife. At the time of the divorce, the joint property becomes the object of division, whereas the premarital property remains excluded from division unless regulated in the prenuptial agreement. If the divorce occurs without a prenuptial agreement, the division of joint property must be executed after a court decision is obtained, which has become final and binding. On the other hand, although the prenuptial agreement serves as a legal means of proof, the judge may ignore it for several reasons. That judge’s consideration can provide legal consequences for the prenuptial agreement in a divorce decision. Therefore, it is recommended that prospective spouses, notaries, and judges, need to understand the differences between premarital and joint property and the legal consequences related to divorce. Prospective spouses are advised to make clear and detailed prenuptial agreements regarding property division in the event of a divorce, thereby reducing potential conflicts and disputes. The notary should assist prospective spouses in drafting fair agreements under applicable laws. Judges, in turn, need to objectively consider prenuptial agreements and ensure that decisions align with both parties’ interests and the principles of justice.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Position of Premarital Property and Joint Property after Divorce: A Study of Premarital Agreement

Rimi¹

2023

sjh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hal ini didasarkan pada pasal 124 yang menyatakan bahwa hanya suami saja yang boleh mengurus harta bersama itu, termasuk menjual, memindahtangankan dan membebaninya tanpa bantuan istri, kecuali dalam hal yang diatur pasal 140. KUH Perdata juga menentukan bahwa istri mempunyai hak untuk melepaskan bagiannya dalam kebersamaan harta kekayaan perkawinan (Rahman et al, 2020). Selain mendapat hak untuk | 28 | melepaskan bagiannya dalam kebersamaan terhadap harta perkawinan, istri dalam KUH Perdata juga mendapatkan hak untuk menuntut pemisahan harta kekayaan.…”

Section: Harta Benda Perkawinanunclassified

“…Pasal 94 ayat 2 Keputusan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomer 154 Tahun 1991 tentang Pelaksanaan Intruksi Presiden Nomer 1 Tahun 1991 mengatur mengenai pembagian harta bersama, Pasal tersebut menyebutkan: " pemilahan bersama dari harta bersama dari seorang suami yang memiliki istri lebih dari satu sebagaiamana yang diatur didalam ayat (1), dihitung pada saat berlangsungnya akad perkawinan yang kedua, ketiga, dan atau keempat". (Rahman et al, 2020) Pembagian harta dalam perkawinan sendiri yang dapat dimohonkan melalui pengadilan agama, dapat dilaksanakan bersamaan dengan pengajuan gugatan perceraian ataupun dapat digugat secara terpisah setelah putus perceraian. Pembagian harta bersama akan ditolak, seiring dengan penolakan yang terjadi pada gugatan.…”

Section: Pengaturanunclassified

Hak Gugat Harta dalam Perkawinan Poligami

Habiansyah

Astutty²,

Az³

et al. 2022

Bhirawa Law J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As social beings, humans in living their daily lives are creatures who communicate with each other and need each other. It becomes a common thing when there is finally an attraction between the opposite sex. Love and affection are the reasons humans are bound in a relationship called marriage. Polygamous marriages cause several somah in marriage. Equality of position between husbands and wives will be determined by the pattern of marriage carried out. Based on legal facts, it is found that the husband's previous wife denied the rights. In addition, the rights to joint property are reduced by the interests of other wives, both second, third, and fourth. The type of research used by the author in this study is a type of normative legal research. If on one occasion another wife (second, third, and or fourth wife) in a marriage with the principle of polygamy commits fraud by using joint property unilaterally, then the first wife can sue civilly to the court against the unfair use of property, or it can go through the court of law. crime as a crime.

show abstract

“…Meningkatnya Cerai Gugat pada Mahkamah Syar'iyah. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,22(2), 2 Rahman, S., et al (2020). Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian: Studi Kasus Perkawinan Poligami.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

The Appointing of a Legal Guardian based on Audi et Alteram Partem Principle and Only One Guardian Principle

Amadea¹,

Putri²,

Nasution³

2022

sjh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines and analyzes the dispute resolution of appointing a legal guardian based on the audi et alteram partem principle and only one legal guardian principle. This research combines normative juridical and empirical research methods. The types and sources of data used in this research are primary and secondary data. The primary data were collected using direct interviews with an informant. While the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data obtained in this research were then analyzed juridically qualitatively. The results show that implementing the dispute resolution of appointing a legal guardian through a lawsuit realizes the principle of audi et alteram partem. Furthermore, with the realization of the audi et alteram partem principle, it will also directly realize the principle of only one guardian or what is known as the principle of one and indivisible. Therefore, it is recommended that the Government make amendments to Government Regulation No. 29 of 2019. In this case, explicitly and regulated disputes over guardianship rights should be examined through the jurisdictio contentiosa mechanism. Thus, anyone has the right to apply as a legal guardian, as long as they meet the requirements, have closeness, and the Child’s willingness.

show abstract

Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian: Studi Kasus Perkawinan Poligami

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

The Position of Premarital Property and Joint Property after Divorce: A Study of Premarital Agreement

The Position of Premarital Property and Joint Property after Divorce: A Study of Premarital Agreement

Hak Gugat Harta dalam Perkawinan Poligami

The Appointing of a Legal Guardian based on Audi et Alteram Partem Principle and Only One Guardian Principle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About