2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Cationic Surfactant on Droplet Wetting on Superhydrophobic Surfaces

Abstract: We experimentally and theoretically examine the influence of a double-chain cationic surfactant, didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB), on the wetting states and contact angles on superhydrophobic (SH) surfaces made of hydrophobic microcylinders. We use two types of micropatterns of different surface roughness, r, and packing fraction, ϕ, and vary nine dimensionless surfactant concentrations (C S), normalized by the critical micelle concentration (CMC), in the experiments. At low C S, some of the surfactant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These useful surfaces allow water drop to sit on the top of the surface textures with gas trapped underneath forming heterogeneous wetting of partial gas–liquid and liquid−solid interfaces in the so-called Cassie–Baxter (CB) or “Fakir” wetting state. , The presence of a gas layer reduces the interfacial energy, thereby thermodynamically making a CB state more favorable by reducing the liquid–solid contact area. The thermodynamically favorable CB state, however, can easily be ruined by transitioning to a homogeneous wetting (Wenzel, W) state via various external influences, such as temperature variation, , surfactant additives, or evaporation. , To date, the wetting and evaporation processes on SH substrates have been extensively studied experimentally and theoretically; however, most studies focus on pure liquids. , ,, In contrast, many relevant and crucial areas remain unexplored; one of these is the influence of amphiphilic aqueous surfactant solutions on the evaporation process upon SH surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These useful surfaces allow water drop to sit on the top of the surface textures with gas trapped underneath forming heterogeneous wetting of partial gas–liquid and liquid−solid interfaces in the so-called Cassie–Baxter (CB) or “Fakir” wetting state. , The presence of a gas layer reduces the interfacial energy, thereby thermodynamically making a CB state more favorable by reducing the liquid–solid contact area. The thermodynamically favorable CB state, however, can easily be ruined by transitioning to a homogeneous wetting (Wenzel, W) state via various external influences, such as temperature variation, , surfactant additives, or evaporation. , To date, the wetting and evaporation processes on SH substrates have been extensively studied experimentally and theoretically; however, most studies focus on pure liquids. , ,, In contrast, many relevant and crucial areas remain unexplored; one of these is the influence of amphiphilic aqueous surfactant solutions on the evaporation process upon SH surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments were performed under ambient temperature (22 °C) at 1 atm and relative humidity of 16 ± 1%. Details regarding the experimental setup and image analysis can be found in our previous papers reporting the initial wetting states of water and surfactant-laden drops, whereas we focus on the static and dynamic wetting of ionic liquids here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] In general, superhydrophobic surfaces can be achieved by introducing micro/nanostructures and reducing the surface energy. 21,22 Superhydrophobic surfaces exhibit excellent self-cleaning, and anti-biofouling and anti-corrosion performances. [23][24][25] However, superhydrophobic surfaces can be easily wetted by liquids of low surface tension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%