1999
DOI: 10.1051/analusis:1999155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a condenser on the analysis by dynamic headspace-GC-MS of the volatile fraction of a cheese

Abstract: Abstract. The insertion of a condenser in the dynamic headspace -GC-MS analysis circuit allows part of the water contained in a water-rich sample to be condensed. The impact of such a condenser on the chromatographic profiles of a cheese was studied for temperatures ranging from -12 to 0°C. The condenser collected the water, but also some of the volatile components of the cheese, irrespective of its operating temperature. Insertion of a condenser improved the overall quality of the chromatographic signal, but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, before desorption, the solid trap can be flushed with an inert dry gas to remove part of the water (dry purge technique) (Canac‐Arteaga, Viallon, & Berdague, ). Another solution is to install a cold‐water trap (condenser at ∼–10 °C) located before the trap to condense the residual water from the sample (condensation technique) (Canac‐Arteaga, Viallon, & Berdagué, ). Other approaches include mixing a hygroscopic salt (such as sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, or potassium carbonate) with the sample (Canac‐Arteaga, Begnaud, Viallon, & Berdagué, ; Valero et al., ; Villaseñor et al., ), or placement of a cartridge with a hygroscopic salt (such as sodium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, or calcium chloride) in front of the trap to eliminate water (Guillot, Fernandez, & Le Cloirec, ).…”
Section: Dynamic Extractions – Purge and Trap Thermal Desorption Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, before desorption, the solid trap can be flushed with an inert dry gas to remove part of the water (dry purge technique) (Canac‐Arteaga, Viallon, & Berdague, ). Another solution is to install a cold‐water trap (condenser at ∼–10 °C) located before the trap to condense the residual water from the sample (condensation technique) (Canac‐Arteaga, Viallon, & Berdagué, ). Other approaches include mixing a hygroscopic salt (such as sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, or potassium carbonate) with the sample (Canac‐Arteaga, Begnaud, Viallon, & Berdagué, ; Valero et al., ; Villaseñor et al., ), or placement of a cartridge with a hygroscopic salt (such as sodium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, or calcium chloride) in front of the trap to eliminate water (Guillot, Fernandez, & Le Cloirec, ).…”
Section: Dynamic Extractions – Purge and Trap Thermal Desorption Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the volatile components profile of a cheese appears to be different depending on the technique and methodology used in its study. Some techniques are only able to extract volatile components of low molecular weight, others modify the headspace of the cheese and others are not able to extract certain components (Férnandez-García, 1996; Canac-Arteaga et al 1999; Hannon et al 2007). Furthermore, there are significant differences in relation to the repeatability of many of the techniques and methodologies used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches to limit these artefacts have already been tested. They include acting on the sample or the adsorbent [11][12][13][14], inserting a water trap between the sample and the adsorbent [15][16][17][18], modifying injection parameters [19] or selecting a particular type of chromatographic column [20].Water activity in the sample can be lowered simply by mixing in hygroscopic substances such as salts or sugars. To date, many studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of such substances on the analysis of the volatile fraction of liquids such as apple juice [21], milk [22] or model aqueous solutions [23][24][25][26][27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches to limit these artefacts have already been tested. They include acting on the sample or the adsorbent [11][12][13][14], inserting a water trap between the sample and the adsorbent [15][16][17][18], modifying injection parameters [19] or selecting a particular type of chromatographic column [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%