2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a magnetic water treatment on homogeneous and heterogeneous precipitation of calcium carbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
94
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This hardness can be considered as moderate by comparison with the values used by many authors [6][7][8][9]. The pH of solution resulting from this preparation was about 6.4.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This hardness can be considered as moderate by comparison with the values used by many authors [6][7][8][9]. The pH of solution resulting from this preparation was about 6.4.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Gabrielli [6] found the increasing of the precipitation of CaCO 3 up to 25 % when the flow circulation still running, while using the same system, Fathi [7] found the increasing of the precipitation of CaCO 3 after the circulation has already completed. According to Fathi, the difference of the result is caused by the difference of analysis method that they used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation has been formulated as follows [10]: Figure 5 shows that the CaCO 3 precipitation increases with the increased circulation time both in magnetic (M) and non-magnetic treatments (NM). Figure 4 shows the magnetic field effect on the CaCO 3 precipitation increases as the addition of the circulation time.…”
Section: Circulation Timementioning
confidence: 99%