2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of acid pretreatment on different parts of corn stalk for second generation ethanol production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
17
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Pointner et al (2014) observed similar trend in corn cob where the cellulose content (38.8%) was significantly lower than the hemicellulose content (44.4%). Other researchers also identified a higher content of hemicellulose in untreated corn cob as compared to the cellulose which was similar to the trend found in this study but with some slight changes in quantity (Garlock et al 2009;Li et al 2016). Contrary to this, the cellulose content of corn cob was reported to be higher than the hemicellulose content in similar studies (Bandikari et al 2014;Dominguez et al 1997;Liu et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The study by Pointner et al (2014) observed similar trend in corn cob where the cellulose content (38.8%) was significantly lower than the hemicellulose content (44.4%). Other researchers also identified a higher content of hemicellulose in untreated corn cob as compared to the cellulose which was similar to the trend found in this study but with some slight changes in quantity (Garlock et al 2009;Li et al 2016). Contrary to this, the cellulose content of corn cob was reported to be higher than the hemicellulose content in similar studies (Bandikari et al 2014;Dominguez et al 1997;Liu et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Then, 200 mL of 2% (w/v) H 2 SO 4 was prepared and poured into the flasks containing the samples as performed by Chen and Xia (2009) with some modifications made on the acid concentration to ensure uniform conditions with AL pretreatment. The 2% (w/v) of H 2 SO 4 used in this study was also used by other researchers in similar studies (Behera et al 2014;Idrees et al 2014;Li et al 2016). The DA pretreatment temperatures studied were 100, 120, 140, and 160°C over pretreatment retention times of 5, 10, 30, and 60 min (Amenaghawon et al 2013;Idrees et al 2014;Jin et al 2013).…”
Section: Dilute Acid Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations