2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of adhesive joint stiffness on optimal size of large-format cladding comparison of artificial and real environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not require any additional surface treatment or the application of a protective coating on the front side, and at the same time the authors had already proved that it is a material suitable for bonding and is compatible with selected adhesive systems. 30,31 The cladding is produced from the following: 63 wt% of wood chips, 25 wt% of Portland cement, 10 wt% of water and 2 wt% of additives promoting hydration (the manufacturer has not provided a detailed description of the additives). This type of particleboard is produced in the basic size of 1.25 × 3.35 m, which was adjusted to the size of the test specimen, 1.10 × 1.85 m. For façade cladding it is suitable to use particleboard with a thickness of 10–12 mm, the first variant with 10 mm being used in the presented case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It does not require any additional surface treatment or the application of a protective coating on the front side, and at the same time the authors had already proved that it is a material suitable for bonding and is compatible with selected adhesive systems. 30,31 The cladding is produced from the following: 63 wt% of wood chips, 25 wt% of Portland cement, 10 wt% of water and 2 wt% of additives promoting hydration (the manufacturer has not provided a detailed description of the additives). This type of particleboard is produced in the basic size of 1.25 × 3.35 m, which was adjusted to the size of the test specimen, 1.10 × 1.85 m. For façade cladding it is suitable to use particleboard with a thickness of 10–12 mm, the first variant with 10 mm being used in the presented case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was based on the creation of an idealised structure. The numerical model of a reference façade section was created via simple linear construction and the limit load states needed for the calculation of the optimal cladding size were determined for each adhesive system, 31 see Table A1 in the supplementary materials. ETAG 034 recommends to test the worst conditions, thus, the largest calculated size of the cladding was tested in combination with all adhesive systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same substrate as in the I and II phase was used, i.e., 10-mm-thick particleboard. The appropriate size of the façade panels was determined on the basis of a numerical model [31]. The largest size of the panel was 915 × 1615 mm.…”
Section: Real Façade Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cladding fires are complex in nature, as multiple factors such as cavity depth, core materials, and environmental conditions can significantly affect the fire spread behavior. Many researchers dedicate their effort to focusing on different aspects of cladding fire [122][123][124][125][126][127]. In this section, we summarized the typical experimental studies on the cladding systems in the latest decade.One of the earliest work on cladding panel fires is carried out by Yoshioka et al, in which a study of a test method in the form that flame blown from the aperture (910 mm square) roasts the façadetype test body (4095 mm high × 1820 mm wide) in 2011.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%