1964
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/19.2.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Age and Experience on Bar Pressing and Activity in the Rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in activity with increasing age is especially striking since the greater size of older rats permitted them to progress more rapidly through the open field than younger ones. A general reduction in activity as a function of age has also been observed by Candland (1959), Desroches, Kimbrell, and Allison (1964), and Denenberg and Smith (1963). Females were consistently more active than males in the open field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The decrease in activity with increasing age is especially striking since the greater size of older rats permitted them to progress more rapidly through the open field than younger ones. A general reduction in activity as a function of age has also been observed by Candland (1959), Desroches, Kimbrell, and Allison (1964), and Denenberg and Smith (1963). Females were consistently more active than males in the open field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…When young and 100 mature rats were compared on an LCBP measure, a complex interaction was obtained (Morrison, 1965), and comparisons of mature-young and senescent rats for operant level and LCBP measures resulted in a small, but reliable, rate difference with mature-young rats making more total responses than senescent rats (Goodrick, 1965). Other studies have shown higher response rates for young than old rats during variable interval bar pressing (Solyom & Miller, 1965), higher rates in a multiple-bar box for old than young rats (Corke, 1964), or have failed to find reliable age response-rate differences (Desroches, Kimbrell, & Allison, 1964;Entwistle, 1959;Goodrick, 1969).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%