Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin

Fu, Jiyang; Saikaew, Pipop; Carvalho, Ricardo Marins de; Hannig, Matthias; Sano, Hidehiko; Selimović, Denis

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015

Cited by 27 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Preconditioning with EDTA using a sonic device has also been shown to improve bonding performance of UAs with the SE strategy on sclerotic dentin . Since residual water and/or solvent may compromise the performance of UAs, studies have demonstrated prolonged air‐blowing after adhesive application for 15–30 s versus manufacturer recommended 5–10 s to enhance immediate adhesive properties of UAs . Caries‐affected dentin is a more challenging substrate for bonding than sound dentin where ER adhesives work better than SE adhesives .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing demand for simplified and user-friendly adhesive systems has led to the development of a new class of adhesives termed as Universal Adhesives (UAs). The term "Universal" reflects manufacturers' claims that these adhesives can be applied with any adhesion strategy and offer the versatility of use with a variety of direct and indirect restorative materials. The aim of this review was to synthesize the literature regarding the current status of UAs, their adhesion potential to various substrates and their performance in different restorative situations. In vitro studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews were identified utilizing controlled vocabulary and keyword searches in Medline and EMBASE databases. About 282 studies (272 in vitro studies; 11 clinical studies) were included. Available laboratory and clinical evidence does not support the claim that UAs can be used with any adhesive strategy. Although, they can chemically bond to various tooth and direct/indirect restorative substrates, the stability of this bond is material-dependent and subject to hydrolytic degradation. Hence, additional measures are still needed to ensure long-term durability. which undermines the versatility of UAs. The lack of long-term data regarding the clinical performance of UAs further complicates clinical decision-making.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To analyze if operating light exposures with different illumination powers have an effect on enamel bonding, three commercially available universal adhesives were studied in the present study. These resin adhesive systems are called as universal adhesives, as manufacturers claim that these adhesives could be used in total-etching, self-etching and selective etching modes for enamel and dentin bonding [17].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Resin bonding to enamel and dentin with simplified adhesive systems should be considered as highly techniquesensitive clinical procedures since a number of factors including material [17,19], evaporation of solvents and water [17], type of adhesive application [6,17,20], application time [12] affect their bonding performances. It seems meaningful that sensitivity of light-cured resin adhesive to operating light exposure would be another potential factor would affect bonding performances of selfetch adhesive, since effects of potentially premature polymerization of adhesive resin due to exposing operating light have not well-studied in the literature.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Operating Light Exposure on Enamel Bonding Performances of Universal Adhesives

Ayar¹,

Erdemir²

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study evaluated the effect of operating light exposure conditions on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin bonded to enamel with three different universal adhesives used in self-etching mode. Tested adhesives were Single Bond Universal (SBU), G-Premio Bond (GB) and Nova Compo-B Plus (NB) and tested illumination conditions were, ambient light, 22.000 lux, and 8.000 lux. Ninety bovine incisors were used for SBS test (n = 10). Effect of operating light expose on the fluidity of adhesives was assessed. Resin-enamel interfaces were also evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. Two-way Analysis of Variance showed that material had a significant effect on SBS (p < 0.000) unlike the illumination condition (p = 0.459). GB provided significantly lower bond strength than those of SBU and NB (p<0.05). High power operating light likely reduces the fluidity of all adhesives. Thus, it could be recommended that clinicians would prefer to use the tested resin adhesive systems at an illuminance of 8.000 lux.

show abstract

“…Thus, in the present study, no capping layer was placed on top of the flowable bulk-fill materials under investigation. The universal adhesive Scotchbond Universal was selected because it showed reliable results in both laboratory [ 33 , 34 , 35 ] and clinical studies [ 36 , 37 ]. To ensure time-saving application in the treatment of children, the universal adhesive was used in self-etch mode and thus was in line with previous studies [ 38 , 39 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Margin Integrity of Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This in vitro study examined the margin integrity of sculptable and flowable bulk-fill resin composites in Class II cavities of primary molars. Standardized Class II cavities were prepared in human primary molars and restored with the following resin composite materials after application of a universal adhesive: a sculptable bulk-fill composite (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TEC) or Admira Fusion x-tra (AFX)), a flowable bulk-fill composite (Venus Bulk Fill (VBF) or SDR), or a conventional composite (Filtek Supreme XTE (FS)). The bulk-fill materials were applied in 4 mm layers, while the conventional composite was applied in either 2 mm (FS2, positive control) or 4 mm layers (FS4, negative control). The specimens were exposed to thermo-mechanical loading (TML) in a computer-controlled masticator. A quantitative margin analysis was performed both before and after TML using scanning electron microscopy, and the percentage of continuous margins (margin integrity) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). All composites showed a significant decline in margin integrity after TML. AFX exhibited the significantly highest margin integrity of all materials after TML (97.5 ± 2.3%), followed by FS2 (79.2 ± 10.8%), TEC (73.0 ± 9.1%), and FS4 (71.3 ± 14.6%). SDR (43.6 ± 22.3%) and VBF (25.0 ± 8.5%) revealed the lowest margin integrity. In conclusion, the tested sculptable bulk-fill materials show similar or better margin integrity in primary molars than the conventional resin composite placed in 2 mm increments.

show abstract

Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin

Cited by 27 publications

References 33 publications

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

Effect of Operating Light Exposure on Enamel Bonding Performances of Universal Adhesives

Margin Integrity of Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About