2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of air drying temperature on the quality of rehydrated dried red bell pepper (var. Lamuyo)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
84
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
16
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference reflects the different rehydration capacity of the dried plums. Hot-air drying usually leads to destruction of tissues and cell wall collapse (Vega et al, 2008;Therdthai and Zhou, 2009). These results could indicate that the RAE-treated sample had the best quality among the dehydrated plums.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This difference reflects the different rehydration capacity of the dried plums. Hot-air drying usually leads to destruction of tissues and cell wall collapse (Vega et al, 2008;Therdthai and Zhou, 2009). These results could indicate that the RAE-treated sample had the best quality among the dehydrated plums.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Kaur and Singh (1981) also reported the similar findings. Vega-Galvez et al (2008) reported loss of vitamin C during drying of red pepper.…”
Section: Effect Of Drying Parameters On Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum rehydration ratio was observed at 60°C, 50 m/min air velocity for initial size of 4 cm. This behaviour might be due the fact that more heating coagulates the protoplasmic protein and destroys the osmotic properties of cell membrane, resulting less swelling of dehydrated material (Vega-Galvez et al 2008). Non Enzymatic Browning of Dried Cauliflower Browning of dried cauliflower was significantly affected by DT, AV, DT and AV, DT and S, AV and S, and DT 2 model terms (Table 3 and Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Drying Parameters On Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these differences are predominantly attributed to the carotenoid pigments degradation, which are mostly sensitive to heat induction. The variation of b * is mainly observed at low temperatures and may be caused by the development of some brown pigments related to non-enzymatic reactions activated during the drying process (Vega-Gálvez et al, 2008), while changes in L * parameters, are observed mainly at low temperatures and air velocities, which had achieved an enzymatic browning of the food matrix.…”
Section: Effect Of Drying Processes On the Cape Gooseberry Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%