2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: The moderating role of institutional investors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has the following contributions: First, it enriches and expands the literature in the field of influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality. The existing literature mainly examines the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality from the perspectives of government regulation (Darrell and Schwartz, 1997 [ 7 ]; Cho and Patten, 2007 [ 8 ]; Huang and Kung, 2010 [ 9 ]), corporate governance (Brammer and Pavelin, 2006 [ 10 ]; Zeng et al, 2012 [ 11 ]; Okere et al, 2021 [ 12 ], Gerged, 2021 [ 13 ]), firm characteristics (Brammer and Pavelin, 2008 [ 14 ]; Lu and Abeysekera, 2014 [ 15 ]; Cormier et al, 2005 [ 16 ]; Ismail et al, 2018 [ 17 ]; Kumar, 2021 [ 18 ]), executive characteristics (Lewis et al, 2014 [ 19 ]; Chen et al, 2021 [ 20 ]; Caputo et al, 2021 [ 21 ]), culture and institution (Buhr and Freedman, 2001) [ 22 ], media attention (Rupley et al, 2012 [ 23 ]; Solikhah and Maulina, 2021 [ 24 ]), political connection (Li et al, 2022 [ 25 ]), air quality (Wang et al, 2021 [ 26 ]), institutional ownership (Tarkhouni et al, 2020 [ 27 ], Li et al, 2022 [ 28 ]) and green credit (Zhan, 2021 [ 29 ]). This study examines the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality from the perspective of business strategy, so as to broaden the research boundary of the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has the following contributions: First, it enriches and expands the literature in the field of influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality. The existing literature mainly examines the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality from the perspectives of government regulation (Darrell and Schwartz, 1997 [ 7 ]; Cho and Patten, 2007 [ 8 ]; Huang and Kung, 2010 [ 9 ]), corporate governance (Brammer and Pavelin, 2006 [ 10 ]; Zeng et al, 2012 [ 11 ]; Okere et al, 2021 [ 12 ], Gerged, 2021 [ 13 ]), firm characteristics (Brammer and Pavelin, 2008 [ 14 ]; Lu and Abeysekera, 2014 [ 15 ]; Cormier et al, 2005 [ 16 ]; Ismail et al, 2018 [ 17 ]; Kumar, 2021 [ 18 ]), executive characteristics (Lewis et al, 2014 [ 19 ]; Chen et al, 2021 [ 20 ]; Caputo et al, 2021 [ 21 ]), culture and institution (Buhr and Freedman, 2001) [ 22 ], media attention (Rupley et al, 2012 [ 23 ]; Solikhah and Maulina, 2021 [ 24 ]), political connection (Li et al, 2022 [ 25 ]), air quality (Wang et al, 2021 [ 26 ]), institutional ownership (Tarkhouni et al, 2020 [ 27 ], Li et al, 2022 [ 28 ]) and green credit (Zhan, 2021 [ 29 ]). This study examines the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality from the perspective of business strategy, so as to broaden the research boundary of the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, whether the firm manages the environment in its production operations, e.g., controlling the release of pollutants (Kim et al, 2019) and reducing carbon emissions (Yao et al, 2019). Second, whether the firm discloses environmental information (e.g., Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methods and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, environmental information quality disclosure is an important measure of CEM. Wang et al (2021) found that institutional investors significantly positively moderate the effect of air pollution on corporate environmental information disclosure by studying China's New Environmental Protection Law, which plays a monitoring role. There are exceptions, however.…”
Section: Investorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to regulators, EID has attracted the attention of many scholars. Extant research has revealed that corporate EID is not only related to numerous micro factors, including corporate governance (Husted and Sousa-Filho, 2019; Lu and Wang, 2021), business strategy (Wang et al , 2021b), financial conditions (Xu et al , 2021; Wang et al , 2022) and environmental performance (Baalouch et al , 2019; Giannarakis, 2018) but is also affected by macro determinants, such as government regulations (Lu and Wang, 2021; Pan and Yao, 2021), anti-corruption (Wei and He, 2022) and air quality (Wang et al , 2021a). However, there is a dearth of research linking it with digital finance (DF), which is an essential feature of the current digital economy that has exerted substantial influence on firms’ financing, production and operation activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%