1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(78)80005-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of alcohols on the critical micelle concentration decrease in the aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond this point, pentanol partitions into the micellar inner core, where it should have little or no effect on surface charge but would increase the size of the micelle and thereby decrease conductance. It has also been shown that alcohols decrease the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of surfactant solutions and increase the aggregate number of the micelles (15,17,18,19). These latter effects should decrease the conductance but are apparently secondary to the effect on surface charge, as indicated by the increase in conductance up to interfacial saturation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Beyond this point, pentanol partitions into the micellar inner core, where it should have little or no effect on surface charge but would increase the size of the micelle and thereby decrease conductance. It has also been shown that alcohols decrease the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of surfactant solutions and increase the aggregate number of the micelles (15,17,18,19). These latter effects should decrease the conductance but are apparently secondary to the effect on surface charge, as indicated by the increase in conductance up to interfacial saturation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Swarm building of nearly hexagonally packed alcohols around the cation and separation of these by 0.5 from the next pillar caused a reduction of the interaction with respect to pure liquid alcohol with a van der Waals interaction of 5.85 k J/mole CH2 (Lagaly and Weiss, 1970). In the systems H20-nRNH3C1 two different isotropic micellar solutions appear at different molar concentrations as shown in Table 2 of Nery et al, 1980. In the ternary systems H20-ionic surfactant-n-alcohol the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of the system H20-surfactant decreases by addition of n-alcohol as shown by hexanol for the system H20-C12H25NH3C1 (Herzfeld et al, 1950), by butanol for q2H25N(CH3)3Br-H20 (Guveli et al, 1979), and by n-alcohols in aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (SDS) (Hayase and Hayano, 1978). The last authors showed a linear decrease of the logarithm of CMC of SDS (mole fraction) as a function of the mole fraction of 1-alcohol in the aqueous phase.…”
Section: Enthalpy Of Solution In the Interlamellar Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The In CMC of the interlamellar RNH3+-cations as a function of the molar fraction of 1-alcohol in the aqueous phase is given in Figure 4, analogous to the treatment of Hayase and Hayano (1978). In comparison with their system water-SDS-alcohol a higher cation concentration was needed but a lower alcohol concentration for the aggregate formation.…”
Section: Aggregates In Solutions and At Solid-liquid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption and micelle formation of a surfactant in the presence of an alkanol have been studied from the viewpoint of the additive effect of the alkanol [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, we have applied the thermodynamic treatment of surfactant mixture [8] to mixtures of alkanol and surfactant from the standpoint of mixed adsorption and micelle formation [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%