1972
DOI: 10.1038/newbio237058a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Anti-immunoglobulin Antisera on Homograft Rejection in Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the recent observation of a lower number of antibody-forming cells in the spleen, lymph nodes, and gut of germfree mice treated neonatally with anti-/z (24). We have since reported that neither anti-# nor anti-~,l~,2 antisera are capable of altering the course of homograft rejection in mice, even in massive doses far in excess of those required to effect profound humoral suppression (25). We report here the extension of our studies to include mice treated initially as young adults and our investigations of the mechanism and extent of this type of suppression.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees with the recent observation of a lower number of antibody-forming cells in the spleen, lymph nodes, and gut of germfree mice treated neonatally with anti-/z (24). We have since reported that neither anti-# nor anti-~,l~,2 antisera are capable of altering the course of homograft rejection in mice, even in massive doses far in excess of those required to effect profound humoral suppression (25). We report here the extension of our studies to include mice treated initially as young adults and our investigations of the mechanism and extent of this type of suppression.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…We have no information bearing on the question of suppression of thymus-derived cells involved in humoral antibody responses other than the indirect evidence afforded by the homograft studies reported previously (25). In that case we found absolutely no evidence of prolongation of survival of homografted skin resulting from the use of either anti-/z or anti-~,l~,2, even when the grafted animals were massively treated from the day of birth on through the entire rejection period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Second, since there is no known antibody production to the minor antigens, we could evaluate the in vivo effect of the B cells themselves rather than that of their secreted products. Third, it should be possible to assess subtle differences in responsiveness that might have been missed with antigenically more disparate grafts (65)(66)(67). We found that there was no delay in the kinetics with which ~MT mice rejected the BALB.B grafts ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For this purpose, the infection was followed in mice deprived of B-lymphocytes by the administration, from birth, of rabbit antiserum to mouse IgM. In such mice, there is selective impairment of B-cell development, leading to a pan-specific suppression of the synthesis of all classes of immunoglobulin (8, 14, 16), whereas T-cell function remains intact (8,15). The results reported herein have demonstrated that initial control of the parasitemia is relatively unaffected by lack of B-cell function, whereas the parasites cannot be eliminated from the blood under such conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%