2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of artificial and natural diets on energy allocation in Litopenaeus setiferus (Linnaeus, 1767) and Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) early postlarvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher survival observed in co-fed shrimp mysis and PL as compared to animals fed only Artemia is in agreement with studies reporting nutritional benefits when complementing live feed with inert diets and/or using additives to manipulate the nutritional composition of live feed, which improves the overall response of shrimp with respect to live food alone (Léger et al, 1985;Coutteau et al, 1997;Gallardo et al, 2002;Calderon et al, 2004). Brito et al (2004) also reported higher growth in L. vannamei and L. setiferus fed co-feeding regimes as compared to regimes consisting only in Artemia without microalgae. Some studies have reported good survival and complete larval development to PL 1 when shrimp are fed only on microalgae (Kuban et al, 1985;Rodriguez et al, 1994;Naranjo et al, 1999).…”
Section: Larval Growth and Survivalsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The higher survival observed in co-fed shrimp mysis and PL as compared to animals fed only Artemia is in agreement with studies reporting nutritional benefits when complementing live feed with inert diets and/or using additives to manipulate the nutritional composition of live feed, which improves the overall response of shrimp with respect to live food alone (Léger et al, 1985;Coutteau et al, 1997;Gallardo et al, 2002;Calderon et al, 2004). Brito et al (2004) also reported higher growth in L. vannamei and L. setiferus fed co-feeding regimes as compared to regimes consisting only in Artemia without microalgae. Some studies have reported good survival and complete larval development to PL 1 when shrimp are fed only on microalgae (Kuban et al, 1985;Rodriguez et al, 1994;Naranjo et al, 1999).…”
Section: Larval Growth and Survivalsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The presence of microalgae and its components, even at low concentration in the gut, can trigger the production of digestive enzymes (Reitan, Rainuzzo, Oie & Olsen, 1993;Sheele, 1993). It has been demonstrated that the consumption of the biota present in the farming systems improves the activity of digestive enzymes and physiological status of farmed aquatic animals (Brito, Chimal, Gelabert, Gaxiola & Rosas, 2004). Le Vay, Rodriguez, Kamarudin and Jones (1993) noticed that microalgae enhance trypsin activity in Japanese mitten lobster, Pariibacus japonicas, as they contain large amounts of free amino acids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be very well contributed to the better nutritional profile. Brito et al (2004) also noticed that for the PL of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) and Litopenaeus setiferus a combination of Artemia, microparticulate commercial diet and algae was a better feed than Artemia or commercial diet alone. The best growth reported with all diet combination is also supported by significantly higher protein content in PL20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%